You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 53 No. 6, June 1937 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

FACTORS INFLUENCING THE RESULTS OF TONSILLECTOMY AND ADENOIDECTOMY

A STUDY OF FIVE HUNDRED AND FORTY CHILDREN, CORRELATING THE PREOPERATIVE COMPLAINTS, THE AGE OF THE CHILD, THE TYPE OF TONSILS AND MICROSCOPIC STUDY OF THE TONSILS WITH THE POSTOPERATIVE RESULTS

M. EPSTEIN, M.D.

Am J Dis Child. 1937;53(6):1503-1520.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Disappointing results following tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy are common, perhaps unnecessarily so. Diverse results in apparently similar cases are common enough to have led Dean1 to say before a recent national meeting of otolaryngologists: "Practically, the removal of tonsils is always a gamble." No one disagreed with him. Yet there must be differences between the children who are benefited by tonsillectomy and those who are not. A knowledge of those differences should decrease the number of disappointing results.

It was with the hope of gaining an understanding of at least some of those differences that this study, in which 540 children were seen before and after their operations for a period of two years, was made.

There were two objects in mind. The first object, as already intimated, was to determine, if possible, what points in the history of the case and in the appearance of the throat are significant . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

EL PASO, TEXAS

From the Otho S. A. Sprague Memorial Institute and the Children's Memorial Hospital, Chicago.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1937 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.