This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

BÉLA SCHICK, M.D.; ANNE TOPPER, M.D.

Am J Dis Child. 1929;38(5):929-934.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Tonsillectomy has been advocated not only to relieve symptoms referable to diseased tonsils themselves, but also as a means of protection against subsequent infections. The evidence concerning the protection that tonsillectomy may afford against diphtheria consists chiefly in statements by experienced clinicians that they have rarely observed this disease in children whose tonsils have been completely removed.

In 1916, Tomlin¹ of Indianapolis suggested that tonsillectomy might reduce the incidence of diphtheria by eliminating the portal of entry and also by reducing the number of bacilli carriers. In 1917, Boot² of Chicago observed that "there is no doubt that children who have had tonsillectomy done are less susceptible to diphtheria." In the same year, Perry³ of St. Louis wrote as follows: "Our city doctors in charge of the isolation department tell me that they have never found a case of diphtheria in a patient who has had the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
NEW YORK

From the Pediatric Department, Mount Sinai Hospital.

Footnotes
Submitted for publication, June 18, 1929.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?