You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 23 No. 5, May 1922 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

SITTING-HEIGHT AND STEM-LENGTH IN PRIVATE SCHOOL BOYS

H. GRAY, M.D.

Am J Dis Child. 1922;23(5):406-418.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Reason for Studying These Measurements.—As a gage of build, the hitherto honored standard of stature (standing-height, H) is equaled or excelled by the "essential stature" (the body-trunk, measured by different observers from slightly different landmarks, e. g., sitting-height, Si, or stem-length, {lambda}). Evidence for this statement has been exhibited in recent papers1 on the relation between these three body-measurements (H, Si, {lambda}) and body-weight.

A new interest, therefore, arises in standards of sitting-height and of stem-length for children at successive ages. For the former (Si) tables already exist, but only (with rare exceptions) for children (1) of mixed nationality, (2) in public schools, and (3) without exclusion of those clinically below par. For stem-length ({lambda}) no tables have been found in the literature.

The motive of this paper accordingly is the offer of tentative standards of sitting-height and especially stem-length for children: (1) of American birth and, indeed, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

BOSTON


Footnotes

Received for publication Dec. 10, 1921.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1922 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.