You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 151 No. 7, July 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  THE PEDIATRIC FORUM
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Diagnostic Value of the Respiratory Rate in Febrile Children Younger Than 2 Years

Antonio Alberto Lopes, MD, PhD
Departamento de Medicina Faculdade de Medicina Universidade Federal da Bahia Salvador, Brazil

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151(7):747-748.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The article by Taylor et al1 published in the March 1995 issue of the ARCHIVES assesses important questions for health care providers, particularly pediatricians who work at emergency services. Taylor et al determined age-specific values of the respiratory rate to define tachypnea in febrile children younger than 2 years. After defining these age-specific values, the authors estimated the validity of tachypnea in identifying children in whom subsequently pneumonia was or was not diagnosed, using a combination of radiological findings and follow-up clinical data as a standard criterion. They showed to be aware of methodological standards for precision (or uncertainty) of the results for test accuracy when they reported 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for test sensitivities and specificities.2,3 Confidence interval is considered to be an adequate way to describe sensitivities and specificities, and several other parameters estimated from samples, because it helps health care providers to assess the strength . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.