You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 148 No. 11, November 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  The Pediatric Forum
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Plasmapheresis vs Intravenous Immunoglobulin Treatment in Childhood Guillain-Barré Syndrome

Jiri Vajsar, MD; Avril Sloane, MB, BCh; Ellen Wood, MD; E. Gordon Murphy, MD
Toronto, Ontario

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1994;148(11):1210-1212.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Plasmapheresis (PE) is effective in the treatment of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), but it may be technically difficult to perform in children. We have shown that high-dose intravenous (IV) immunoglobulin is also effective in the treatment of childhood GBS.1 To compare the therapeutic efficacy of IV immunoglobulin and PE, we retrospectively reviewed the charts of 15 consecutive children with a severe form of GBS (functional disability score of grade 4 or worse) who were treated with one of these methods.

Patient Reports. Seven girls and eight boys were treated during the past 5 years. Their mean age was 10.7 years (range, 4 to 16 years). All the children met the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke criteria for the diagnosis of GBS.2 All patients, except one with normal laboratory results, had characteristic cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities. Furthermore, all patients had at least one abnormality on nerve conduction . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.