This Article  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

HOWARD DUBOWITZ, MD; MAUREEN BLACK, PHD; DONNA HARRINGTON, PHD
Department of Pediatrics University of Maryland School of Medicine 700 W Lombard St Baltimore, MD 21201

Am J Dis Child. 1993;147(2):130.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.—Brayden raises some interesting issues regarding the diagnosis of sexual abuse. However, it would be a minimalist role for pediatricians to only report the history and physical findings. Indeed, pediatricians (and others) need to interpret the information and make a (perhaps tentative) assessment of the likelihood of abuse to make a report to child protective services. This decision does need to be guided by state law. In addition, child protective services should be interested in the pediatrician's findings and assessment.

Few caseworkers, lawyers, or judges are in a position to interpret the physical findings. Although a final decision on the likelihood of abuse may be made by the public agencies, a comprehensive assessment and well-reasoned opinion facilitates this process. The distinction between a medical opinion and a diagnosis appears to be largely semantic. Clearly, if the diagnosis is uncertain, appropriate caution is warranted.

In addition to state reporting . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?