You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 146 No. 8, August 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  THE EDITORIAL BOARD SPEAKS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The 'New' Curriculum: Is It New?

Am J Dis Child. 1992;146(8):906.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

I belong to an illustrious group of pediatricians called the Irish and American Paediatric Society. A friend in this society sent me a book1 on Sir Dominic Corrigan, a famous physician in Ireland during the 19th century. Sir Dominic, of course, is known to many of us for his description of the signs of aortic insufficiency, especially the "water hammer" or Corrigan's pulse. I expected to read a biography of interest only to those with the Corrigan surname. To my delightful surprise it was not only an biography but a history of medical practice and education in Ireland at that time. Familiar names jumped out—physicians such as Robert Graves, William Stokes, Robert Adams, and Abraham Colles. What struck my fancy and my attention was that these farsighted medical men were considered iconoclasts of medical education. Can you image that they espoused the new education techniques, developing in Germany, of students actually touching patients? This group of Irish educators firmly believed that the way to learn was to get involved. They insisted on smallgroup discussions, obtaining accurate patient histories and performing physical examinations that were verified by the teacher, and assessment of patients' problems that included a prognosis and plans for treatment. These educators also gave the students free time to do independent learning or research. Another feature of the Dublin system in those days was the insistence of the teacher that patients who died undergo autopsy (which was usually conducted by the attending physician) and "the back of me hand" to those students who failed to attend. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.