You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 145 No. 9, September 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  THE PEDIATRIC FORUM
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Response of Seronegative Adults to Measles Immunization

HERBERT BRAUNSTEIN, MD; SUSAN THOMAS, MT(ASCP); RAY ITO, MT(ASCP); CAROLE JARMAN, MA, RN
San Bernardino County Medical Center 780 E Gilbert St San Bernardino, CA 92404

Am J Dis Child. 1991;145(9):969.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Sir.—In March 1990 we published a study in AJDC1 indicating that adult hospital employees, with significant frequency, tested seronegative to measles. We identified 16 such workers whom we subsequently immunized with monovalent measles vaccine. We further recommended and initiated a screening program to test new employees for immunity to measles and to immunize those who tested seronegative.

Correspondents have suggested to us that these seronegative individuals might represent primary immunization failures, and, therefore, a significant number might not seroconvert following the administration of vaccine. Some expressed interest in follow-up data on this population.

Accordingly, we solicited and were able to obtain serum samples from 15 seronegative individuals and study them by the methods described in our article.1 Of these 15 employees who were subsequently vaccinated, 13 were members of the original group of 16 and two were employees identified in our ongoing screening program.

All 15 employees . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.