This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

JAN BAYS, MD; CAROLE JENNY, MD
Emanuel Hospital & Health Center 2801 N Gantenbein Ave Portland, OR 97227; Kempe National Center 1205 Oneida St Denver, CO 80220

Am J Dis Child. 1991;145(8):849.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.—The case described by Baker is unfortunate. It is intrusive and even abusive for a child to be taken to multiple examiners for repetitive genital examinations. Herman-Giddens and Berson¹ have described parents who focus excessively on their child's genitalia, including parents who performed genital inspections or took the child for multiple examinations or procedures by professionals. Many physicians have not been trained to perform detailed genital examinations,² and further confusion arises if the examiner is unsure or mistaken in interpreting physical findings. It is unfortunate that the mother in the case described by Baker, and apparently the child protective authorities, "remained convinced that abuse had occurred" even after being informed that the "bruise" was a venous plexus.

Regardless of whether a child is being molested, unresolved allegations of sexual abuse in the context of a divorce or custody dispute create additional stress for the child. These . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?