This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

GEORGE W. BROWN, MD
PO Box 1269 Los Lunas, NM 87031

Am J Dis Child. 1991;145(3):249-250.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

—The essay on P values was meant to alert readers to possible adverse numeric consequences of repeated, mindless, automatic grinding out of statistical tests. (This kind of unplanned data dredging might employ an automaton named Robostat.) I also wanted to point out the usefulness of the-binomial expansion [(p + q)ⁿ = 1.0] in some ordinary biomedical situations.

Dr Coulter raises an interesting technical issue in hypothesis testing. Hypothesis formation and testing are somewhat different, and much more complex, subjects than those addressed in the essay on P values. Research hypotheses involve elements that are much more "scientific" than mere probability phenomena. Researchers incorporate many elements into their hypotheses, elements such as prior experience, extrinsic knowledge, biologic plausibility, subjective judgments, and so on.

For example, the essay on P values omitted discussion of one-tailed vs two-tailed statistical tests. The decision whether to use a one-tailed or a two-tailed test depends on the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?