You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 144 No. 9, September 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  THE PEDIATRIC FORUM
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Agent B and the Distort System: Another Approach

EDWARD A. MORTIMER, JR, MD
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine 2119 Abington Rd Cleveland, OH 44106-2333

JAMES D. CHERRY, MD
Department of Pediatrics UCLA School of Medicine 18033 Le Conte Los Angeles, CA 90024-1752

Am J Dis Child. 1990;144(9):954.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Sir.—Hecht's account1 of the ill treatment that agent B received at the hands of the justice system would be difficult to believe except for the fact that many such travesties have occurred and continue to occur. Physicians should have little difficulty in recognizing agent B, an agent that has saved millions of lives worldwide in the past 40 years. Accusations regarding the risks of this agent lack scientific validity, but have resulted in litigation and publicity that have endangered its acceptance by the public, impeded the development of analogous products for other disorders, and wasted millions of dollars.

Dr Hecht is correct that the current justice mechanisms in this country, particularly those related to liability for personal injury, are inappropriately constituted for the resolution of these issues. Lay juries cannot be expected to comprehend complex scientific issues, and most judges have difficulty understanding them as well. Indeed, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.