You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 143 No. 7, July 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  THE PEDIATRIC FORUM
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Assessment of Neurodevelopmental Outcome in Surfactant-Replacement Therapy-Reply

YVONNE E. VAUCHER, MD
Medical Director, ISCC Follow-up UCSD 225 Dickinson St San Diego, CA 92103-1990

Am J Dis Child. 1989;143(7):763.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.—We appreciate Dr Langkamp's concern that the widespread use of surfactant-replacement therapy among very-low-birth-weight infants with surfactant deficiency might result in an exchange of increased neurodevelopmental morbidity for decreased mortality caused by respiratory distress syndrome. Although a larger patient population would be ideal to exclude a type II error conclusively, our follow-up data, based on a randomized, controlled trial of human surfactant replacement, did not indicate substantial differences in major neurologic or developmental sequelae, such as cerebral palsy or severe mental retardation, between surfactant recipients and placebo-treated infants receiving conventional ventilation. We cannot yet exclude differences between the two groups in later sequelae, such as communication disorder, attention-deficit disorder, perceptual-motor abnormalities, or learning disability. While a 100% follow-up rate is desirable, this is difficult to accomplish in most regions of the United States given family mobility, high frequency of low socioeconomic status, and the lack of universal access to health . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Footnotes

We note that in our Table footnote, a decimal point was missing; the SEM should have read 1.5 months, not 15 months.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.