You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 9, September 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  THE PEDIATRIC FORUM
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Bone Mineral Content in Infants: Which Machine or Which Bone?-Reply

NIDIA VYHMEISTER, MD
Department of Pediatrics

THOMAS A. LINKHART, PHD
Departments of Pediatrics and Biochemistry Loma Linda University Medical Center Loma Linda, CA 92350

Am J Dis Child. 1988;142(9):919.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.—In testing the humerus as a site for BMC measurements, we used the commercially available instrument we had (Norland 278A). We are therefore referring to measurements performed with a specific instrument. We have not performed the study using other instruments, but, as far as we know, this has not been done by others either. If the BMC at the humerus and radius sites were measured by another instrument (eg, Lunar instrument), we believe that our studies would be confirmed by the "more sensitive" instrument.

The coefficient of variation in our article referred to the variability of repositioning, together with the variability between two different investigators. This cannot be compared with the repositioning variability of one investigator, which was apparently the case in the article by Greer et al. In our studies, the coefficient of variation for the measurement, done by one investigator in the postmortem studies, was 3.6%, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.