You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 9, September 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  THE PEDIATRIC FORUM
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Munchausen's Syndrome by Proxy and Video Surveillance

JAMES D. FROST, JR, MD; DANIEL G. GLAZE, MD
Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics Baylor College of Medicine One Baylor Plaza Houston, TX 77030

CAROL LYNN ROSEN, MD
Department of Pediatrics BHS 101 Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons 630 W 168th St New York, NY 10032

Am J Dis Child. 1988;142(9):917-918.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Sir.—In their informative article in the October 1987 issue of AJDC describing various aspects of Munchausen's syndrome by proxy, Zitelli et al1 made the statement, "Practices such as secretly going through mother's possessions, unannounced home visits,2 and concealed videotaping3 may be unacceptable to many professionals, difficult to carry out, and in some instances illegal [reference numbers changed]." We strongly disagree with the authors' inclusion of concealed videotaping (with reference to our 1983 article3) among unacceptable or illegal practices. We also find such an inclusion surprising, since the authors emphasized the difficulty of achieving a favorable outcome in legal proceedings initiated to protect the child. Our decision to use hidden camera surveillance in this instance,3 and in subsequent cases,4 was based on the knowledge that a definitive diagnosis, supported by incontrovertible evidence, is crucial in such court proceedings. We believe that our primary obligation, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.