You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 8, August 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  THE PEDIATRIC FORUM
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cerebral Palsy in Children With Birth Complications-Reply

KARIN B. NELSON, MD; JONAS H. ELLENBERG, PHD
National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke 7550 Wisconsin Ave Room 8C-16 Bethesda, MD 20892

Am J Dis Child. 1988;142(8):814-815.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.—Dr Copian is correct that a higher proportion of infants in the Collaborative Perinatal Project of the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke (NCPP) study population who had birth complications and low Apgar scores died early and therefore were not candidates for the development of cerebral palsy. That information was presented in an earlier report in JAMA.1 Since our recent report was concerned chiefly with whether a surviving term child with birth complications was at heightened risk for disability if he or she was asymptomatic as a newborn, we did not reexamine the question of mortality.

It would be possible to speculate, for children in this study who died, the effect on the results if they had lived. If the children who died had lived and had had a similar distribution of neonatal signs as the children who really did survive, then the comparative risks of cerebral palsy in the complicated and uncomplicated groups would have remained substantially unchanged. If, on the other hand, a large proportion of the nonsurviving children had lived and had a very high rate of multiple neonatal signs, then the results might have been markedly different. There seems to be no reasonable argument based on NCPP data for a choice of one assumption . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.