You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 5, May 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  EDUCATIONAL INTERVENTIONS
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (11)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Survey of Undergraduate Pediatric Education

Progress in the 1980s?

Olle Jane Z. Sahler, MD; Jerome P. Lysaught, EdD; Larrie W. Greenberg, MD; Benjamin S. Siegel, MD; Steven E. Caplan, MD; Kathleen G. Nelson, MD

Am J Dis Child. 1988;142(5):519-523.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In 1981, Stillman et al1 published the results of a survey of pediatric clerkship programs in US and Canadian medical schools. The study was prompted by the belief that reorientation of educational goals, redistribution of patients toward outpatient care, and increased numbers of medical students necessitated a reassessment of the structure and function of the categorical clerkship.

Of the 141 pediatric departments contacted by Stillman and coworkers,1 119 (84%) responded. How to define objectives for instruction adequately and how to evaluate appropriately students' fund of cognitive information, interviewing and physical examination skills, and problem-solving ability were the most common and highest-priority concerns of clerkship directors. Frequently identified weaknesses in clerkship design included lack of uniformity in the educational experience, overemphasis on tertiary care coupled with inadequate ambulatory care opportunities, and insufficient student contact with faculty.

When the original study was undertaken, increasing attention was being paid to such . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations



From the Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry (Dr Sahler), and Graduate School of Education and Human Development, University of Rochester (Dr Lysaught), Rochester, NY; Office of Medical Education, Children's Hospital National Medical Center, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC (Dr Greenberg); Department of Pediatrics, Boston City Hospital-Boston University School of Medicine (Dr Siegel); Departments of Pediatrics, Sinai Hospital of Baltimore and The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (Dr Caplan); and Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham (Dr Nelson).


Footnotes



Accepted for publication Jan 8, 1988.

Reprints not available.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.