You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 12, December 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  THE PEDIATRIC FORUM
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Oropharyngeal Examination for Suspected Epiglottitis-Reply

ROBERT D. MAURO, MD; STEVEN R. POOLE, MD; CHARLES H. LOCKHART, MD
Department of Pediatrics; Department of Anesthesiology The Children's Hospital University of Colorado School of Medicine Denver, CO 80218

Am J Dis Child. 1988;142(12):1266-1267.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Sir.—We thank the many AJDC readers who responded to our recent article and to Dr Fulginiti's editorial. Of the 15 correspondents, ten wrote to agree with our approach and four to disagree, and one commentator took an intermediate position. We have certainly achieved our goal of stirring debate regarding a widely proclaimed but poorly substantiated tenet of medical dogma.

Of the four dissenting correspondents, none challenged the efficacy of our approach. All wrote to say that six cases of epiglottitis were not sufficient to demonstrate our approach's safety, a point with which we agree, and that we made explicitly in our report. On the other hand, as we also noted in our report, the medical literature contains abundant opinion but hardly any objective data to suggest that our approach is dangerous. Of course, we believe that our approach is safe and reasonable, but we were not interested in arguing our . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.