You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 142 No. 1, January 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Issues Concerning AIDS Embryopathy

JOSÉ F. CORDERO, MD, MPH
Division of Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control Public Health Service US Department of Health and Human Services Atlanta, GA 30333

Am J Dis Child. 1988;142(1):9.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Sir.—Is there an acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) embryopathy? The report by Marion et al1 raises two very significant questions on dysmorphology and the epidemiology of birth defects. What is sufficient evidence to establish that an agent causes a pattern of birth defects? How should potential confounding factors be controlled for when they are closely associated with exposure to the agent under study?

The features reported as characteristics of the AIDS embryopathy are mostly subjective. The evaluation of children for minor anomalies that are subjectively defined, such as prominent vermilion border, patulous lips, prominent forehead, and mild obliquity of the eyes, must take into consideration the possibility of observer bias. If the person examining the child is aware of the exposure to the hypothesized cause of the defect, he or she may unconsciously tend to scrutinize that patient more intensely than if the exposure status is unknown. In the study by . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.