This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

An Exercise in Futility, Wastefulness, and Inappropriate Practice

VINCENT A. FULGINITI, MD; C. GEORGE RAY, MD

Am J Dis Child. 1988;142(1):19-20.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Determination of the infectious disease status of a sick newborn has been a major frustration for physicians who care for these patients. The physician must know whether or not the newborn has a significant infection, given symptoms and signs that can suggest infection or a myriad of noninfectious disorders. Simultaneously, the organism producing the infection must be identified, if possible. Pediatricians have relied on some "gold standards" in this regard: a blood culture, samples of cerebrospinal fluid, or other specimens from normally sterile body sites that yield direct evidence of the presence of pathogens. Furthermore, one wishes to identify and properly treat such new-borns as early in the course of the infection as is possible to avert death and minimize disability.

Physicians have relied on indirect means to select newborns who are most at risk of infection, as well as to predict which agent is likely to be responsible. Included . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Editor, AJDC Box 43700 Tucson, AZ 85733; Departments of Pediatrics and Pathology University of Arizona College of Medicine Tucson, AZ 85724

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?