You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 140 No. 8, August 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  THE PEDIATRIC FORUM
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Pitfalls in Interpretation of Traumatic Lumbar Puncture Formula

RAN D. ANBAR, MD
Children's Service Massachusetts General Hospital 32 Fruit St Boston, MA 02114

Am J Dis Child. 1986;140(8):737-738.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Sir.—A traumatic lumbar puncture obscures the cerebrospinal fluid's original white blood cell (WBC) count. According to recent publications,1-3 the calculation for estimating the contribution of contaminating peripheral blood to the total WBC count of a traumatic spinal tap can be represented as follows: WBCcontaminating = RBCCSF x WBCperipheral/RBCperipheral, in which RBC indicates red blood cells and CSF indicates cerebrospinal fluid. The following discussion demonstrates that the proposed calculation does not permit the clinician to rule out meningitis, which is defined as six or more leukocytes per cubic millimeter (≥x106/L) in the CSF.1

If the patient's peripheral WBC/RBC ratio is estimated (published estimates range from 1/300 to 1/7002-4), the calculated contaminating WBC count may vary by more than 100% depending on the ratio used. Table 1 illustrates the different clinical conclusions that could result. Therefore, estimated ratios should not be . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.