You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 140 No. 6, June 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  THE PEDIATRIC FORUM
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Intact Survival Rates in Nearly Drowned, Comatose Children

J. GORDON McCOMB, MD
Division of Neurosurgery Childrens Hospital of Los Angeles PO Box 54700 Los Angeles, CA 90054-0700

Am J Dis Child. 1986;140(6):504.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Sir.—The article on "Prognostic Variables in Nearly Drowned, Comatose Children" by Nussbaum1 indicated a 37% (19/51) neurologically intact survival rate in nearly drowned children who on initial examination were reported to be flaccid, did not respond to pain, and had fixed dilated pupils, absence of spontaneous respiration, hypotension, and poor perfusion. In a recent study that my colleagues and I have just published,2 our survival rate was only 14% (7/49). Why was there such a significant difference in apparent intact survival rates? Forty-eight of the 49 patients in our series were seen at an outside emergency room and were subsequently transferred to Childrens Hospital of Los Angeles (CHLA). Although complete information was not available, virtually all of the patients were reported not to have any significant motor activity at the time of the initial emergency room admission. When these patients were reexamined at CHLA after an interval . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.