You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 139 No. 6, June 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  THE PEDIATRIC FORUM
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Coagulase-Negative Staphylococcal Septicemia in Newborn Babies

ACHILLE STABILE, MD; MARIA ASSUNTA PESARESI, MD; VINCENZO CURRÒ, MD
Department of Pediatrics Catholic University of Rome L go A Gemelli 8 00100 Rome, Italy

Am J Dis Child. 1985;139(6):541-542.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Sir.—We read with interest your editorial1 on "Staphylococcus epidermidis Septicemia in Children: An Emerging and Difficult Problem" in JAMA and the article of Friedman and her colleagues2 on "Staphylococcus epidermidis Septicemia in Children With Leukemia and Lymphoma," which appeared in AJDC.

Several reports have brought attention to coagulase-negative Stahylococcus bacteremias as a hazard to children with compromised host defenses3 and to critically ill newborns.4 Our data confirm that staphylococcal bacteremia in newborns, particularly in premature infants, should never be ignored.

Twenty-seven newborn babies cared for in our unit with positive blood cultures for coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (30%) (among 90 positive blood cultures) were identified in the last seven years.

Seven (25.9%) of the 27 infants were born at term; four were average for gestational age and three were small for gestational age, with a mean birth weight of 2,804 g. All of these neonates had clinical evidence and laboratory signs of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.