• Online Features  This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (41)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

What's in the Name?

KENNETH M. McCONNOCHIE, MD

Am J Dis Child. 1983;137(1):11-13.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The etymology of bronchiolitis suggests specific histologic findings, and formal recognition of this meaning has been given (American College of Chest Physicians—American Thoracic Society Joint Committee, 1975). Yet, in practice, this label is applied on the basis of clinical findings alone, and diagnostic criteria vary widely. Cardinal among these findings is wheezing, which is a clinical sign associated not with unique, but with various histologic changes. Use of one term to describe both a specific histopathologic entity and a loosely defined clinical syndrome invites obfuscation. In the case of bronchiolitis, it may contribute to the controversy that surrounds this syndrome. I attempt to highlight controversies in the use of this term, to identify their origins, and to suggest principles on which they may be resolved. In selected areas, a resolution is suggested.

According to one observer (McIntosh¹):

Clinicians who care for small children all know what [bronchiolitis] means: an . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations

CiteULike    Connotea    Delicious    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?