You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 131 No. 12, December 1977 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Correction
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Osmolalities of Infant Formulas in Japan

ICHIRO MATSUDA, MD; MIHOKO KAMIMURA, MD
Department of Pediatrics Kumamoto University Medical School Kumamoto, Japan

YOGO OKA, MD; SHINICHIRO ARASHIMA, MD
Department of Pediatrics Hokkaido University School of Medicine Sapporo, Japan

Am J Dis Child. 1977;131(12):1403.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Sir.—Paxson and co-workers' article (Am J Dis Child 131:139, 1977) prompts us to report osmolalities and renal solute load in infant formulas commercially available in Japan.

All of them are powdered formulas and reconstructed with water as

Formula directed by the manufacturer, Osmolality and mineral and nitrogen contents of each reconstructed product were measured at two different laboratories. The osmolality was determined by freezing-point depression method with an osmometer. Sodium and potassium were measured with a flame photometer. Chloride was measured by the Volhard back titration procedure. Nitrogen was measured by the Kjeldahl method. Renal solute load of each formula (mOsm/liter) was calculated as follows: the sum of milliequivalents of sodium, potassium and chloride plus 4 mOsm of urea per gram of protein in a liter of formula.1 Results obtained in both laboratories were quite similar, and the mean of these are listed in the Table. The Committee on . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1977 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.