You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 118 No. 5, November 1969 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Complication of a Circumcision Performed With a Plastic Bell Clamp

LCDR Roger E. Johnsonbaugh, MC; LCDR Bruce P. Meyer, MC; LCDR J. Denis Catalano, MC

Am J Dis Child. 1969;118(5):781.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

DURING A two month period, September and October 1968, plastic bell clamps were used for routine circumcision in the newborn at the Naval Hospital in Pensacola, Fla. Approximately 100 circumcisions were done using this method. They were performed on the second hospital day.

Numerous minor complaints of appearance and not falling off soon enough (less than ten days) were made during this period. These were expected, and appropriate corrective measures were taken.

On one occasion, the plastic bell did not separate, and on the 33rd day the child was brought into the clinic for evaluation. The "ring" portion had become fixed on the glans of the penis resulting in an artificial sulcus on the distal portion of the glans. The bell was removed without difficulty and the child dismissed. Five days later, he was again brought to the clinic with the complaint that the ridge had not disappeared (Fig 1). . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

USN; USNR; USNR, Pensacola, Fla

From the Department of Pediatrics, Naval Hospital, Naval Aerospace Medical Center, Pensacola, Fla.


Footnotes

Received for publication Dec 30, 1968.

The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private ones of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery of the Navy Department, or the naval service at large.

Reprint requests to 1200 Willow Dr, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 (Dr. Johnsonbaugh).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1969 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.