This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

William D. Erickson, MD; E. Omer Burgert, Jr, MD; Hugh B. Lynn, MD

Am J Dis Child. 1968;116(1):1-12.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

IN 1952 King and Shumacker observed that of five infants who had splenectomy in the first six months of life all five later developed serious infections, three of them fatal.¹ Subsequently, many other clinical series as well as many experimental observations appeared in the literature, all designed to demonstrate the role of the spleen in bodily defenses and the hazard of infection associated with the asplenic state. Reported morbidity rates in persons who have had splenectomy have varied from 5% in King and Shumacker's original series to zero in a few small series. Most authors have suggested a gross rate of infection of 5% to 8% following splenectomy, though how many infections have been attributed to splenectomy has depended largely on the judgment of the author. Most writers have recognized that at least some of the postsplenectomy infections were related to the primary disease or were operative complications. Still, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Rochester, Minn

From the sections of pediatrics (Dr. Burgert) and pediatric surgery (Dr. Lynn), Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, and the Mayo Graduate School of Medicine (Dr. Erickson), Rochester, Minn.

Footnotes
Received for publication Nov 24, 1967.

Reprint requests to Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, Minn 55901.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?