You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 114 No. 6, December 1967 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (34)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Proteinuria

A Six-Year Study of Normal Infants, Preschool, and School-Age Populations Previously Screened for Urinary Tract Disease

Martin F. Randolph, MD; Michael Greenfield, MD

Am J Dis Child. 1967;114(6):631-638.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES of urinary tract disease in healthy children have been few, and have concerned themselves with bacteriuria,1,2 asymptomatic bacteriuria, and pyuria,3,4 and with the voiding habits of boys.5 In clinical practice, the routine testing of urine for proteinuria has been the most widely used screening device for urinary tract disease. Yet the magnitude, prevalence, and the persistence of proteinuria has never been prospectively evaluated in healthy children previously screened for urinary tract disease. Much of our knowledge of proteinuria has been borrowed from studies of college, military, and insurance groups incident to routine examination.6-10 While such studies have considerable merit, they may be criticized on one or more counts: proteinuria is not clearly defined in terms of magnitude, frequency of occurrence, or long-term persistence; urine studies are not complete, but deal only with proteinuria; the study population was not previously screened for urinary tract disease; . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations



Danbury, Conn

From the Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine (Dr. Randolph) and the Department of Urology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine (Dr. Greenfield), Danbury, Conn.


Footnotes



Received for publication Aug 3, 1966.

Reprint requests to 70 Deer Hill Ave, Danbury Conn 06810 (Dr. Randolph).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1967 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.