You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 159 No. 7, July 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (26)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Patient Education/ Health Literacy
 •Adolescent Medicine
 •Humanities
 •Medicine and the Media
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Televised State-Sponsored Antitobacco Advertising and Youth Smoking Beliefs and Behavior in the United States, 1999-2000

Sherry Emery, PhD; Melanie A. Wakefield, PhD; Yvonne Terry-McElrath, MSA; Henry Saffer, PhD; Glen Szczypka, BA; Patrick M. O’Malley, PhD; Lloyd D. Johnston, PhD; Frank J. Chaloupka, PhD; Brian Flay, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:639-645.

Background  Recent state budget crises have dramatically reduced funding for state-sponsored antitobacco media campaigns. If campaigns are associated with reduced smoking, such cuts could result in long-term increases in state health care costs.

Methods  Commercial ratings data on mean audience exposure to antitobacco advertising that appeared on network and cable television across the largest 75 media markets in the United States for 1999 through 2000 were combined with nationally representative survey data from school-based samples of youth in the contiguous 48 states. Multivariate regression models were used to analyze associations between mean exposure to state antitobacco advertising and youth smoking-related beliefs and behaviors, controlling for individual and environmental factors usually associated with youth smoking and other televised tobacco-related advertising.

Results  Mean exposure to at least 1 state-sponsored antitobacco advertisement in the past 4 months was associated with lower perceived rates of friends’ smoking (odds ratio [OR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-0.88), greater perceived harm of smoking (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.11-1.42), stronger intentions not to smoke in the future (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.17-1.74), and lower odds of being a smoker (OR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63-0.88).

Conclusions  To our knowledge, this study is the first to explore the potential impact of state-sponsored antitobacco media campaigns while controlling for other tobacco-related advertising and other tobacco control policies. State-sponsored antitobacco advertising is associated with desired outcomes of greater antitobacco sentiment and reduced smoking among youth. Recent cuts in these campaigns may have future negative health and budgetary consequences.


Author Affiliations: Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago (Drs Emery, Chaloupka, and Flay and Mr Szczypka); Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia (Dr Wakefield); Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Drs O’Malley and Johnston and Ms Terry-McElrath); National Bureau of Economic Research, New York, NY (Drs Saffer and Chaloupka); Kean University, Union, NJ (Dr Saffer).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Registration of Clinical Trials
Frederick P. Rivara
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(7):685.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

State Tobacco Counteradvertising and Adolescents
David E. Nelson
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(7):685-687.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effects of Different Types of Antismoking Ads on Reducing Disparities in Smoking Cessation Among Socioeconomic Subgroups
Durkin et al.
AJPH 2009;99:2217-2223.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Tobacco Control in the United States--Recent Progress And Opportunities
Cokkinides et al.
CA Cancer J Clin 2009;59:352-365.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Stealing a March in the 21st Century: Accelerating Progress in the 100-Year War Against Tobacco Addiction in the United States
Fiore and Baker
AJPH 2009;99:1170-1175.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Geographical information systems as a tool for monitoring tobacco industry advertising
Vardavas et al.
Tobacco Control 2009;18:190-196.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Sustaining 'truth': changes in youth tobacco attitudes and smoking intentions after 3 years of a national antismoking campaign
Farrelly et al.
Health Educ Res 2009;24:42-48.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Impact of Tobacco Control Policies and Mass Media Campaigns on Monthly Adult Smoking Prevalence
Wakefield et al.
AJPH 2008;98:1443-1450.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Consequences of dramatic reductions in state tobacco control funds: Florida, 1998-2000
Niederdeppe et al.
Tobacco Control 2008;17:205-210.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Relation between newspaper coverage of tobacco issues and smoking attitudes and behaviour among American teens
Smith et al.
Tobacco Control 2008;17:17-24.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Factors associated with stages of cigarette smoking among Turkish youth
Ertas
Eur J Public Health 2007;17:155-161.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Effect of Televised, Tobacco Company-Funded Smoking Prevention Advertising on Youth Smoking-Related Beliefs, Intentions, and Behavior
Wakefield et al.
AJPH 2006;96:2154-2160.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Obesity--the new frontier of public health law.
Mello et al.
NEJM 2006;354:2601-2610.
FULL TEXT  

Progress and opportunities in tobacco control.
Cokkinides et al.
CA Cancer J Clin 2006;56:135-142.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

State Tobacco Counteradvertising and Adolescents
Nelson
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:685-687.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.