You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 163 No. 6, June 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Review Article
 This Article
 •Abstract
 •PDF
 •eTable
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Patient Education/ Health Literacy
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Asthma
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Review
 •Immunology
 •Allergy
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Quality Improvement Strategies for Children With Asthma

A Systematic Review

Dena M. Bravata, MD, MS; Allison L. Gienger, BA; Jon-Erik C. Holty, MD, MS; Vandana Sundaram, MPH; Nayer Khazeni, MD, MS; Paul H. Wise, MD, MPH; Kathryn M. McDonald, MM; Douglas K. Owens, MD, MS

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(6):572-581.

ABSTRACT

Objective  To evaluate the evidence that quality improvement (QI) strategies can improve the processes and outcomes of outpatient pediatric asthma care.

Data Sources  Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group database (January 1966 to April 2006), MEDLINE (January 1966 to April 2006), Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group database (January 1966 to May 2006), and bibliographies of retrieved articles.

Study Selection  Randomized controlled trials, controlled before-after trials, or interrupted time series trials of English-language QI evaluations.

Interventions  Must have included 1 or more QI strategies for the outpatient management of children with asthma.

Main Outcome Measures  Clinical status (eg, spirometric measures); functional status (eg, days lost from school); and health services use (eg, hospital admissions).

Results  Seventy-nine studies met inclusion criteria: 69 included at least some component of patient education, self-monitoring, or self-management; 13 included some component of organizational change; and 7 included provider education. Self-management interventions increased symptom-free days by approximately 10 days/y (P = .02) and reduced school absenteeism by about 0.1 day/mo (P = .03). Interventions of provider education and those that incorporated organizational changes were likely to report improvements in medication use. Quality improvement interventions that provided multiple educational sessions, had longer durations, and used combinations of instructional modalities were more likely to result in improvements for patients than interventions lacking these characteristics.

Conclusions  A variety of QI interventions improve the outcomes and processes of care for children with asthma. Use of similar outcome measures and thorough descriptions of interventions would advance the study of QI for pediatric asthma care.



INTRODUCTION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Asthma is the most common chronic childhood medical condition in the United States, with serious economic and public health consequences.1 It affects 4.2 million children in the United States and results in an estimated 14.7 million missed school days, 727 000 emergency department visits, and 196 000 hospitalizations annually.2-3 Among children with chronic medical conditions, asthma is the most common reason for hospitalization and school absence.2-3 An estimated $10.7 billion was spent in the United States in 1994 on asthma-related costs4—a cost that is expected to rise to $18 billion by 2020.5

Despite the availability of evidence-based guidelines for the management of pediatric asthma, a significant gap remains between accepted best practices for pediatric asthma care and actual care delivered to asthmatic patients in the United States.5-6 For example, although the National Committee for Quality Assurance has found that more patients with asthma have been prescribed appropriate asthma mediations in recent years (71% in 2003 vs 63% in 2000),7 many children with asthma and their caregivers do not use preventive medications or know how to prevent or treat asthma attacks.5 Diette and colleagues8 evaluated the rate of adherence of asthma care with the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program guidelines for 318 pediatric patients. They found that only 55% of eligible patients used preventive medications daily, 49% had written instructions for handling asthma attacks, and 44% had instructions for adjustment of medication before exposures.8

Given the enormous public health impact of childhood asthma, the Institute of Medicine has designated quality improvement (QI) in asthma care (especially for children with mild/moderate persistent asthma) as a priority area.9 The objective of this study was to evaluate the evidence that QI strategies can improve the processes and outcomes of outpatient pediatric asthma care. Specifically, we sought to evaluate the effects of a variety of types of QI strategies, used singly and in combination, in a variety of outpatient settings to describe the strategies consistently associated with the greatest improvements for children with asthma.


METHODS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

We sought articles describing evaluations of QI strategies for pediatric asthma care. We developed a taxonomy of 9 QI strategies, described in detail elsewhere,10 based on several well-established classification systems.11-14 The 9 strategies are patient education, provider education, organizational change, audit and feedback, provider reminders, patient reminders, facilitated relay of clinical data to providers, financial or legislative incentives, and the promotion of self-monitoring or self-management.

We classified interventions as being principally self-management if the goal of the intervention was to improve the ability of children with asthma or their caregivers to self-monitor and take actions that could reduce the impact of asthma on their lives. In contrast, we classified interventions as being principally patient education if the purpose was to increase asthma knowledge or improve inhaler technique without emphasizing patient decision making or behavior change.10

LITERATURE SEARCH AND DATA SOURCES

In collaboration with professional librarians, we developed search strategies using search terms such as asthma, patient education, caregiver education, self-management, provider education, and reminders (complete search strategies available elsewhere15). We searched 3 databases: the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group database (January 1966 to April 2006), the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group database (January 1966 to May 2006), and MEDLINE (January 1966 to April 2006). We also manually searched the bibliographies of all retrieved articles.

STUDY SELECTION

We included studies that evaluated QI interventions in the outpatient setting for pediatric asthma. We excluded studies that enrolled only adults (age ≥18 years). For studies that enrolled both children and adults, we excluded studies that did not provide separate data for participating children.

We included studies with 1 of 3 designs: randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled before-after trials that included contemporaneous observation periods for control and intervention groups, and interrupted time series trials that reported data at 3 or more points both before and after intervention to facilitate time trend analysis. Included studies had to report at least 1 of the 4 primary outcome measures: clinical status (eg, symptoms or symptom-free days, spirometric measures, number of asthma attacks); functional status (eg, days lost from work or school); health services use (eg, hospital admissions, emergency department visits); or adherence to guidelines (eg, number of patients given prescriptions for inhaled corticosteroids).

STUDY QUALITY

For each included study, we assessed the following predefined quality criteria: whether the investigators clearly described the QI intervention; whether the investigators cited previous literature or a theoretical (conceptual) framework to describe the evidence base for their proposed intervention; whether the patient, caregiver, and/or assessors were blinded to the intervention; whether inclusion/exclusion criteria were explained; whether the unit of analysis was explained; whether intervention assignments were adequately concealed; whether the comparison populations and sites were comparable; and whether informed consent and institutional review board approval were obtained.

DATA ABSTRACTION

Two investigators independently reviewed the title and abstract of each article identified in our search to determine if the article met inclusion criteria. We resolved all disagreements by repeated review and discussion. Full-text review was performed by a single investigator who abstracted data from included studies about the study design, participants, detailed descriptions of the QI intervention, and the reported primary outcomes. In addition to the primary outcomes, we also abstracted data concerning the following secondary outcomes: cost of the QI strategy implementation and asthma-related health care costs; patient or provider satisfaction; quality of life outcomes; and reduction in tobacco exposure and environmental allergens. A second investigator verified all abstracted data. Multiple articles describing the same population were included only once in our analyses.

DATA SYNTHESIS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

There have been numerous previous systematic reviews of asthma self-monitoring, self-management, or patient education.16-35 To avoid duplicating the work done in prior reviews, we did not evaluate the comparative effectiveness of symptom-based vs peak flow–based self-monitoring or self-management interventions. Instead, we evaluated specific intervention characteristics (eg, setting, teaching strategy, intensity of the intervention) and population characteristics (eg, adolescents, country of residence) associated with improvements in outcomes of care for children with asthma.

We used exploratory univariate analyses to identify the patient, study design characteristics, and interventions associated with the 4 primary outcomes of interest. Because we made multiple comparisons, we applied a Bonferroni correction and rejected the null hypothesis for 2-tailed P values ≤.0125 (0.05 / 4 = 0.0125).

For each study reporting the same specific outcome (eg, percentage of predicted peak flow), we quantitatively summarized the results of the studies using a random-effects model. Often, the included studies did not report means or standard deviations for the outcomes of interest in a common manner. Thus, for several of the outcomes, such as symptom-free days, we calculated the rate of the outcome per month (denoted p) for the treatment and control groups. We calculated the variance of this rate as pq/n, where q = 1 – p and n = sample size at the end of the trial.36 We also calculated the difference in p (preintervention – postintervention) between the intervention and control groups.

To minimize heterogeneity, we only synthesized those studies describing similar interventions in similar populations. We performed formal assessments of heterogeneity by the {chi}2 and I2 statistics.37 We performed least squares regression (weighted by the sample size) to identify associations between the intervention characteristics and improvements in these outcomes. We sought evidence of publication bias by visual inspection of funnel plots and calculation of the fail-safe N. We performed these analyses using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 2.0 (Biostat, Englewood, New Jersey), RevMan version 4.2.8,37 and SPSS version 11 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois).


RESULTS
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

DESCRIPTION OF STUDIES OF QI FOR CHILDREN WITH ASTHMA

We identified 3843 potentially relevant articles (Figure 1), of which 91 articles describing 79 studies of QI strategies for children with asthma met our inclusion criteria (eTable). Interventions were performed between 1974 and 2004 and ranged in length from 4 weeks to 5 years. Most were performed in the United States (46), Australia (7), the United Kingdom (6), the Netherlands (4), or Canada (4). The median sample size was 97 (interquartile range, 47-194). Interventions occurred in various settings, including outpatient clinics (38%), home (14%), and school (18%). In 10% (8 of 79) of studies, providers (ie, physicians, nurses, or pharmacists) were the target of the intervention.


Figure 1
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 1. Literature search and review results. QI indicates quality improvement.


Of the 79 included studies, 63 (80%) were RCTs, 5 (6%) were quasi-RCTs, and 11 (14%) were controlled before-after trials. Eleven RCTs compared 2 or more QI interventions but lacked a control group that did not also receive a QI intervention (ie, in general, they compared more and less intense QI interventions).38-48 Not surprisingly, these studies generally found improvements in both groups over baseline. Because they lacked a true control group, these 11 studies were excluded from our analyses. The 54 remaining RCTs were less likely to report statistically significant improvements in the processes and outcomes of care for children with asthma than were studies of other designs (63% vs 93%; P value = .04).

Articles often did not report detailed information about the interventions, making quality assessment difficult. For example, only 43 studies (54%) described a theoretical framework for their intervention. In general, studies reporting a theoretical framework were no more likely to observe improvements in outcomes for patients with asthma. However, studies reporting decreases in health services use tended to have described a theoretical basis for their intervention (P = .048).

Table 1 presents baseline and final data for studies reporting outcomes in a sufficiently similar manner to be combined and represents data from all types of QI strategies. The data on guideline adherence were highly heterogeneous and often not readily interpretable (eg, often studies would report the number of patients taking inhaled corticosteroids but would not report whether this was because disease severity had increased or because of increased adherence to guidelines); thus, we do not present these results. There was no statistically significant difference in measured outcomes between the intervention and control groups for the 3 other types of outcome measures.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Table 1. Distribution of Included Studies by Reported Outcomea


Only 8% (6 of 79) of studies exclusively enrolled adolescents.49-54 None of the 6 interventions directed exclusively at adolescents resulted in significant improvements in medication use, asthma symptoms control, or health services use.

RESULTS BY SPECIFIC QI STRATEGY

Self-monitoring or Self-management

Twenty-six studies evaluated self-management interventions for children with asthma or their caregivers; 83% of these reported at least 1 statistically significant outcome in the intervention group compared with the control group. Self-management intervention studies (n = 7) had a 2.8% improvement in the rate of symptom-free days per month (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6%-5%; P = .02; equivalent to approximately 0.8 day per month), whereas interventions that did not include self-management showed no such improvement (Figure 2). Similarly, self-management intervention studies (n = 16) demonstrated a 0.4% reduction in the rate of monthly school absenteeism (95% CI, 0%-0.7%; P = .03; equivalent to approximately 0.1 day per month), whereas interventions that did not include self-management had no significant reduction in school absenteeism (Figure 3). We sought study design and intervention characteristics associated with the greatest reductions in school absenteeism. Using the standardized mean difference in school absenteeism as the dependent variable in weighted least squares regression, we found that the longer the study, the greater the expected reduction in asthma-related school absenteeism (P < .001) (Table 2).


Figure 2
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 2. Symptom-free days per month are greater in the self-management studies. The upper panel presents the difference in the postintervention rate in symptom-free days per month in the intervention and control groups from the studies that used quality improvement strategies other than self-management. The lower panel presents the difference in the postintervention rate in symptom-free days per month in the intervention and control groups in the studies that evaluated self-management strategies. Studies to the right of 0 indicate those that have more symptom-free days in the intervention than in the control group.



Figure 3
View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 3. School absenteeism per month is decreased in the self-management studies. The upper panel presents the difference in the postintervention rate of school days missed per month in the intervention and control groups from the studies that used quality improvement strategies other than self-management. The lower panel presents the difference in the postintervention rate of school days missed per month in the intervention and control groups in the studies that evaluated self-management strategies. The studies to the left of 0 indicate more days missed in the control group than in the intervention group.



View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Table 2. Association of Pediatric Self-management, Self-monitoring, and/or Patient Education Intervention Characteristics and Reductions in School Absenteeisma


Patient/Caregiver Education

Forty-seven studies evaluated interventions designed primarily to educate children or parents/caregivers of children with asthma. Most (86%) demonstrated at least 1 statistically significant improvement. Among all studies of pediatric asthma evaluating self-management or patient education interventions, those directed at parents/caregivers (especially for the youngest children) were most likely to be associated with statistically significant improvement in clinical outcomes (P = .02) (Table 3). Among the interventions targeting parents/caregivers, the summary reduction in asthma hospitalization rates for asthma was 1.2% per year (95% CI, 0.1%-2.4% per year; P = .03) (Figure 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Table 3. Association of Pediatric Self-management and/or Patient Education Intervention Characteristics and Finding Significant Clinical Outcomesa



Figure 4
View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[as a PowerPoint slide]
 
Figure 4. Mean hospitalizations per year are decreased in the caregiver education studies. The upper panel presents the difference in the postintervention rate of hospital days per year in the intervention and control groups from the studies that used quality improvement strategies other than caregiver education. The lower panel presents the difference in the postintervention hospital days per year in the intervention and control groups among the studies that evaluated caregiver education. The studies to the left of 0 indicate fewer hospital days per year in the intervention group than in the control group.


Provider Education

Seven interventions were designed to provide training for clinicians caring for children with asthma.55-57,70-71,84-85,94-98 All of these gave providers information regarding asthma treatment guidelines, appropriate follow-up for asthmatic patients, and information about methods for educating patients in self-monitoring and self-management techniques. However, these interventions differed dramatically in terms of intensity and scope of training (ranging from a single one-on-one training session97 to a year-long multistaff, multisession program56). All but 1 study found statistically significant improvements in use of medications (most often increases in the use of inhaled controller medications). Several found improvements in asthma symptoms and reductions in emergency department use. Given the small number and heterogeneity of these studies, we cannot evaluate the specific provider education intervention characteristics most likely associated with improvements in clinical outcomes.

Organizational Change

Thirteen studies evaluated organizational change strategies designed to alter the structure or delivery of care to improve the efficiency or breadth and depth of clinical care provided to children with asthma.52, 58-59,72, 86-87,99-100 These interventions fell broadly into 2 categories: those that augmented the care provided in pediatric clinics by adding specially trained personnel (nurses, pharmacist, or psychologists) and those that provided an increased level of asthma care in schools (through directly observed asthma therapy). These relatively heterogeneous studies tended to report improvements in the number of asthmatic patients receiving inhaled controller medications. Five studies of organization change reported school absenteeism and found a 0.4% decline in absenteeism per month in the intervention group at the end of the trial compared with control participants (95% CI, 0.1%-0.8%; P = .004; equivalent to about 0.1 day per month).40, 58-60,72-73

Interventions With Multiple QI Strategies

We found that the greater the number of QI strategies used, the more likely a study was to report statistically significant improvements in clinical outcomes. In particular, we found that patient and provider education interventions that also included an element of organizational change (for example, adding pharmacists to the clinical team or instituting an information system that facilitated reporting of clinical information between patients and providers) were often associated with improvements in clinical outcomes for patients.

OTHER REPORTED OUTCOMES

Thirty-four studies reported emergency department/urgent care visits (including 15 with self-management components, 7 with parent/caregiver education components, 18 with patient education components, 6 with organizational change components, and 5 with provider education components). None of the specific QI strategies resulted in a significant difference between intervention and control participants in emergency department/urgent care visits at the end of the study.

Of the 7 studies reporting asthma-related health care cost data, 5 reported reduced costs among the intervention groups.42, 48, 74, 86, 101 Most studies only included the costs and benefits accrued during the first year after an intervention.

Fourteen studies reported quality of life results.39, 46-47,51-52,59-62,73-74,99, 102-104 Of these, only 4 found significantly better quality of life in the intervention group compared with the control group. Notably, most of the studies that failed to report improvements in quality of life used individualized, or "one-on-one," educational sessions.

SENSITIVITY ANALYSES

We found no evidence of publication bias. Stepwise single-study elimination did not significantly affect the outcomes for which we present summary effect sizes. For some QI strategies, we found a significant association between the year that the intervention was performed and the reporting of statistically significant improvements in patient outcomes. However, we did not determine why more recent interventions might produce incrementally better outcomes for intervention subjects relative to controls.


COMMENT
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Our review of 79 QI interventions for asthma in children found that many different interventions improve process and outcomes of care. Given that effective care for children with asthma includes the complex interplay of multiple factors, including the recognition and reduction of key triggers, identification of symptoms, knowledge of and timely access to asthma medications, and ability to effectively use medications, it is not surprising that some of the most effective QI interventions involved multiple QI strategies—a characteristic shared by effective QI interventions for adults.15 Among children with asthma, the education of parents/caregivers to reduce environmental triggers, recognize symptoms in their children, and help administer medication is critical. Especially among low-income populations, this may require considerable effort, including attempts to reduce household tobacco use and the provision of vacuum cleaners or air filters for reduction of dust mites in addition to providing education regarding the fundamentals of asthma treatment and prevention. Additionally, the involvement of pharmacists and/or nurse specialists to help ensure that patients have and know how to use appropriate medications has been repeatedly demonstrated to be an effective component of successful QI interventions. The QI strategies with the greatest body of evidence of effectiveness include the self-management and patient education interventions. Other strategies worked well in specific circumstances. Overall, the included studies suggest that QI interventions can improve asthma care, although the magnitude of the improvement was modest for many interventions. There is not sufficient evidence to determine definitively which strategy or combinations of strategies work best for a given situation.

Our key findings were that self-management interventions increased symptom-free days by approximately 10 per year, a difference that is likely to be clinically important. The effect of self-management interventions on school absenteeism was much more modest—a reduction of just more than a day per year. Children, particularly the very young, are less likely to have either adequate asthma knowledge or the capacity to take disease-modifying actions without considerable assistance from their caregivers; we advocate for the inclusion of caregivers in asthma self-management strategies for this population.

Among the other QI strategies, provider education and organizational change strategies were likely to be associated with improvements in medication use. Of concern was the finding that none of the 34 studies that reported use of emergency department or urgent care visits found a difference in number of visits across a variety of QI interventions.

Because most of the included QI interventions were designed to change behavior on the part of patients with asthma, their caregivers, or providers, we hypothesized that interventions specifically designed based on the principles of effective behavior change would be most likely to produce improved outcomes for patients. For example, it has been previously demonstrated that a key component of successful interventions is understanding the barriers to providing high-quality care.105 The included studies rarely described even basic information about underlying gaps in care that their interventions were trying to address. Even among the included studies that described a theoretical foundation for the design of their intervention (54%), many provided scant information about the rationale for the specific design characteristics of the intervention. We did find a trend for those studies that described a theoretical framework to be more likely to report significant improvements in health services use. Given the robust literature on intervention characteristics associated with durable behavior change, future QI interventions for asthma care should strive to incorporate those characteristics with a history of effectiveness in similar situations.

Our results suggest that QI interventions that specifically target adolescents require additional evaluations. None of the 6 studies of educational interventions that exclusively enrolled adolescents with asthma resulted in significant durable improvements in key asthma outcomes. Clearly, identification of targeted QI interventions that result in effective behavior change for this vulnerable population requires further investigation.

Relatively few of the included studies reported economic outcomes. Thus, the extent to which cost savings may be obtained from QI interventions for asthma has not been well documented. A critical gap in this literature that prevents a comprehensive understanding of the cost-effectiveness of QI programs is that there is not a common effectiveness variable (eg, symptom-free days gained). Furthermore, since many studies only include the costs and benefits accrued during the first year after an intervention, it is difficult to estimate the long-term cost-effectiveness of these programs. Given the enormity of the costs associated with asthma care, this is an important area for future research.

This review has several limitations. The included articles were highly heterogeneous with respect to the rigor of the QI strategies implemented, the quality of their study designs, and the details provided about each. We had hoped to identify specific intervention characteristics associated with the greatest improvements for patients with asthma. Unfortunately, we were limited by the lack of detailed information about the interventions or baseline data for the outcomes of interest. Absence of specific information about the intervention's design limits reproducibility and understanding of the extent to which interventions may be relevant for use in other populations or other settings. Because too few studies reported the same specific outcomes (eg, medication use), we used a composite outcome for some of our analysis (namely, any statistically significant result reported for ≥1 of the 4 outcomes of interest: clinical status, functional status, health services use, or guideline adherence). The use of this composite outcome limited our ability to delineate which QI strategies were more likely to be associated with improvements in each of the specific outcomes.

Despite these limitations, the literature suggests that QI strategies can begin to bridge the gap between best practices for asthma care and actual care delivered to children with asthma. Use of similar outcome measures and thorough descriptions of interventions would advance the study of QI for asthma care. The key targets for future study are identifying those strategies that can effectively reduce emergency department and urgent care visits, reduce overall costs for patients with asthma, and increase their quality of life.


AUTHOR INFORMATION
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

Correspondence: Dena M. Bravata, MD, MS, Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, Stanford, CA 94305-6019 (dbravata{at}stanford.edu).

Accepted for Publication: November 13, 2008.

Author Contributions: Dr Bravata had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Bravata, Holty, McDonald, and Owens. Acquisition of data: Bravata, Gienger, Holty, Sundaram, and Owens. Analysis and interpretation of data: Bravata, Gienger, Holty, Khazeni, Wise, McDonald, and Owens. Drafting of the manuscript: Bravata, Holty, Khazeni, and Owens. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Bravata, Gienger, Holty, Sundaram, Wise, McDonald, and Owens. Statistical analysis: Bravata and Wise. Obtained funding: Bravata, McDonald, and Owens. Administrative, technical, and material support: Gienger, Holty, Sundaram, and McDonald. Study supervision: Bravata and Owens.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Funding/Support: This work was performed by the Stanford–University of California, San Francisco Evidence-based Practice Center under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (contract 290-02-0017), Rockville, Maryland. Dr Owens and Ms Sundaram were supported in part by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Role of the Sponsors: The funding agencies had no role in the design or conduct of the study; collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data; or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.

Additional Contributions: Jessie McGowan, BMus, MLIS, of the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group and Shirley Ward of the Cochrane Consumers and Communication Group helped with the literature searches, Corinna Haberland, MD, helped with data abstractions, and Cristina Galvin, MS, provided administrative assistance for this report.

Author Affiliations: Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research (Drs Bravata, Khazeni, Wise, and Owens and Mss Gienger, Sundaram, and McDonald), Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (Drs Holty and Khazeni), and Department of Pediatrics (Dr Wise), Stanford University, Stanford, and VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto (Ms Sundaram), California.


REFERENCES
 Jump to Section
 •Top
 •Introduction
 •Methods
 •Results
 •Comment
 •Author information
 •References

1. Bloom B, Dey AN. Summary health statistics for US children: National Health Interview Survey, 2004. Vital Health Stat 10. 2006;(227):1-85. PUBMED
2. Mannino DM, Homa DM, Akinbami LJ, Moorman JE, Gwynn C, Redd SC. Surveillance for asthma—United States, 1980-1999. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2002;51(1):1-13. PUBMED
3. Asthma prevalence, health care use and mortality, 2002. National Center for Health Statistics, Health Data for All Ages (HDAA). http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/hestats/asthma/asthma.htm. Accessed January 1, 2007. In.
4. Respiratory diseases. In: Healthy People 2010. Vol 2. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2002.
5. Lara M, Rosenbaum S, Rachelefsky G; et al. Improving childhood asthma outcomes in the United States: a blueprint for policy action. Pediatrics. 2002;109(5):919-930. FREE FULL TEXT
6. Practical Guide for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. Expert Panel Report 2: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, US Dept of Health and Human Services, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Asthma Education and Prevention Program; 1997. Publication 97-4063.
7. The State of Health Care Quality: Industry Trends and Analysis. Washington, DC: National Committee for Quality Assurance; 2004.
8. Diette GB, Skinner EA, Nguyen TT, Markson L, Clark BD, Wu AW. Comparison of quality of care by specialist and generalist physicians as usual source of asthma care for children. Pediatrics. 2001;108(2):432-437. FREE FULL TEXT
9. Adams K, ed, Corrigan JM, ed. Priority Areas for National Action: Transforming Health Care Quality. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004.
10. Shojania KG, McDonald KM, Wachter RM, Owens DK. Closing The Quality Gap: A Critical Analysis of Quality Improvement Strategies. Volume 1—Series Overview and Methodology. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004. AHRQ Publication 04-0051-1.
11. Ellis P, Robinson P, Ciliska D; et al. Diffusion and Dissemination of Evidence-based Cancer Control Interventions: Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 79 (Prepared by Oregon Health & Science University Under Contract 290-97-0017). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2003. AHRQ Publication 03-E032.
12. Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R; et al. Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care. 2001;39(8)(suppl 2):II2-I45. ISI | PUBMED
13. Stone EG, Morton SC, Hulscher ME; et al. Interventions that increase use of adult immunization and cancer screening services: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(9):641-651. FREE FULL TEXT
14. Weingarten SR, Henning JM, Badamgarav E; et al. Interventions used in disease management programmes for patients with chronic illness—which ones work? Meta-analysis of published reports. BMJ. 2002;325(7370):925. FREE FULL TEXT
15. Bravata D, Sundaram V, Lewis R; et al. Asthma Care: Technical Review 9 (Prepared by the Stanford University–UCSF Evidence-based Practice Center Under Contract 290-02-0017). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2007. AHRQ Publication 04(07)-0051-5.
16. Aronson N, Lefevre F, Piper M; et al. Management of chronic asthma. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001;(44):1-10. PUBMED
17. Toelle BG, Ram FS. Written individualised management plans for asthma in children and adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(3):CD002171. PUBMED
18. Toelle BG, Ram FS. Written individualised management plans for asthma in children and adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(2):CD002171. PUBMED
19. Devine EC. Meta-analysis of the effects of psychoeducational care in adults with asthma. Res Nurs Health. 1996;19(5):367-376. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
20. Bernard-Bonnin AC, Stachenko S, Bonin D, Charette C, Rousseau E. Self-management teaching programs and morbidity of pediatric asthma: a meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1995;95(1, pt 1):34-41. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
21. Gibson PG, Coughlan J, Wilson AJ; et al. Self-management education and regular practitioner review for adults with asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD001117. PUBMED
22. Lefevre F, Piper M, Weiss K, Mark D, Clark N, Aronson N. Do written action plans improve patient outcomes in asthma? An evidence-based analysis. J Fam Pract. 2002;51(10):842-848. ISI | PUBMED
23. Powell H, Gibson PG. Options for self-management education for adults with asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(1):CD004107. PUBMED
24. Guevara JP, Wolf FM, Grum CM, Clark NM. Effects of educational interventions for self management of asthma in children and adolescents: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2003;326(7402):1308-1309. FREE FULL TEXT
25. Warsi A, Wang PS, LaValley MP, Avorn J, Solomon DH. Self-management education programs in chronic disease: a systematic review and methodological critique of the literature. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164(15):1641-1649. FREE FULL TEXT
26. Wolf FM, Guevara JP, Grum CM, Clark NM, Cates CJ. Educational interventions for asthma in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(1):CD000326. PUBMED
27. Gibson PG, Coughlan J, Abramson M. Self-management education for adults with asthma improves health outcomes. West J Med. 1999;170(5):266. ISI | PUBMED
28. Gibson PG, Powell H. Written action plans for asthma: an evidence-based review of the key components. Thorax. 2004;59(2):94-99. FREE FULL TEXT
29. Clark NM, Nothwehr F. Self-management of asthma by adult patients. Patient Educ Couns. 1997;32(1)(suppl):S5-S20. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
30. Meijer RJ, Kerstjens HA, Postma DS. Comparison of guidelines and self-management plans in asthma. Eur Respir J. 1997;10(5):1163-1172. ABSTRACT
31. Sudre P, Jacquemet S, Uldry C, Perneger TV. Objectives, methods and content of patient education programmes for adults with asthma: systematic review of studies published between 1979 and 1998. Thorax. 1999;54(8):681-687. FREE FULL TEXT
32. Gibson PG, Powell H, Coughlan J; et al. Limited (information only) patient education programs for adults with asthma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(2):CD001005. PUBMED
33. Dosa N, Ilardi D. An opportunity for school nurses and pediatricians to collaborate. School Nurse News. 2003;20(5):16-22. PUBMED
34. Sterk PJ, Buist SA, Woolcock AJ; et al. The message from the World Asthma Meeting: the Working Groups of the World Asthma Meeting, held in Barcelona, Spain, December 9-13, 1998. Eur Respir J. 1999;14(6):1435-1453. ABSTRACT
35. Partridge MR, Hill SR. Enhancing care for people with asthma: the role of communication, education, training and self-management. 1998 World Asthma Meeting Education and Delivery of Care Working Group. Eur Respir J. 2000;16(2):333-348. ABSTRACT
36. Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1985.
37. Manager R. (RevMan) [computer program]. Version 4.2.8 for Windows. Copenhagen, Denmark: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration; 2003.
38. Butz AM, Syron L, Johnson B, Spaulding J, Walker M, Bollinger ME. Home-based asthma self-management education for inner city children. Public Health Nurs. 2005;22(3):189-199. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
39. Chan DS, Callahan CW, Sheets SJ, Moreno CN, Malone FJ. An Internet-based store-and-forward video home telehealth system for improving asthma outcomes in children. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2003;60(19):1976-1981. FREE FULL TEXT
40. Charlton I, Antoniou AG, Atkinson J; et al. Asthma at the interface: bridging the gap between general practice and a district general hospital. Arch Dis Child. 1994;70(4):313-318. FREE FULL TEXT
41. Colland VT, van Essen-Zandvliet LE, Lans C, Denteneer A, Westers P, Brackel HJ. Poor adherence to self-medication instructions in children with asthma and their parents. Patient Educ Couns. 2004;55(3):416-421. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
42. Greineder DK, Loane KC, Parks P. A randomized controlled trial of a pediatric asthma outreach program. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999;103(3, pt 1):436-440. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
43. Guendelman S, Meade K, Benson M, Chen YQ, Samuels S. Improving asthma outcomes and self-management behaviors of inner-city children: a randomized trial of the Health Buddy interactive device and an asthma diary. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156(2):114-120. FREE FULL TEXT
44. Krishna S, Francisco BD, Balas EA, Konig P, Graff GR, Madsen RW, Randomized trial. Internet-enabled interactive multimedia asthma education program: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2003;111(3):503-510. FREE FULL TEXT
45. Lewis CE, Rachelefsky G, Lewis MA, de la Sota A, Kaplan M. A randomized trial of A.C.T. (asthma care training) for kids. Pediatrics. 1984;74(4):478-486. FREE FULL TEXT
46. Walders N, Kercsmar C, Schluchter M, Redline S, Kirchner HL, Drotar D. An interdisciplinary intervention for undertreated pediatric asthma. Chest. 2006;129(2):292-299. FREE FULL TEXT
47. Wensley D, Silverman M. Peak flow monitoring for guided self-management in childhood asthma: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170(6):606-612. FREE FULL TEXT
48. Yoos HL, Kitzman H, McMullen A, Henderson C, Sidora K. Symptom monitoring in childhood asthma: a randomized clinical trial comparing peak expiratory flow rate with symptom monitoring. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2002;88(3):283-291. ISI | PUBMED
49. Bynum A, Hopkins D, Thomas A, Copeland N, Irwin C. The effect of telepharmacy counseling on metered-dose inhaler technique among adolescents with asthma in rural Arkansas. Telemed J E Health. 2001;7(3):207-217. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
50. Cowie RL, Underwood MF, Little CB, Mitchell I, Spier S, Ford GT. Asthma in adolescents: a randomized, controlled trial of an asthma program for adolescents and young adults with severe asthma. Can Respir J. 2002;9(4):253-259. PUBMED
51. Henry RL, Gibson PG, Vimpani GV, Francis JL, Hazell J. Randomized controlled trial of a teacher-led asthma education program. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2004;38(6):434-442. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
52. Salisbury C, Francis C, Rogers C; et al. A randomised controlled trial of clinics in secondary schools for adolescents with asthma. Br J Gen Pract. 2002;52(485):988-996. ISI | PUBMED
53. Shah S, Peat J, Mazurski E; et al. Effect of peer led programme for asthma education in adolescents: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2001;322(7286):583-585. FREE FULL TEXT
54. van Es SM, Nagelkerke AF, Colland VT, Scholten RJ, Bouter LM. An intervention programme using the ASE-model aimed at enhancing adherence in adolescents with asthma. Patient Educ Couns. 2001;44(3):193-203. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
55. Brown R, Bratton SL, Cabana MD, Kaciroti N, Clark NM. M. CN. Physician asthma education program improves outcomes for children of low-income families. Chest. 2004;126(2):369-374. FREE FULL TEXT
56. Evans D, Mellins R, Lobach K; et al. Improving care for minority children with asthma: professional education in public health clinics. Pediatrics. 1997;99(2):157-164. FREE FULL TEXT
57. Lozano P, Finkelstein JA, Carey VJ; et al. A multisite randomized trial of the effects of physician education and organizational change in chronic-asthma care: health outcomes of the Pediatric Asthma Care Patient Outcomes Research Team II Study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158(9):875-883. FREE FULL TEXT
58. Halterman JS, Szilagyi PG, Yoos HL; et al. Benefits of a school-based asthma treatment program in the absence of secondhand smoke exposure: results of a randomized clinical trial. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158(5):460-467. FREE FULL TEXT
59. Kamps AW, Brand PL, Kimpen JL; et al. Outpatient management of childhood asthma by paediatrician or asthma nurse: randomised controlled study with one year follow up. Thorax. 2003;58(11):968-973. FREE FULL TEXT
60. Kamps AW, Roorda RJ, Kimpen JL, Overgoor-van de Groes AW, van Helsdingen-Peek LC, Brand PL. Impact of nurse-led outpatient management of children with asthma on healthcare resource utilisation and costs. Eur Respir J. 2004;23(2):304-309. FREE FULL TEXT
61. Shames RS, Sharek P, Mayer M; et al. Effectiveness of a multicomponent self-management program in at-risk, school-aged children with asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2004;92(6):611-618. ISI | PUBMED
62. Brown JV, Bakeman R, Celano MP, Demi AS, Kobrynski L, Wilson SR. Home-based asthma education of young low-income children and their families. J Pediatr Psychol. 2002;27(8):677-688. FREE FULL TEXT
63. Evans D, Clark NM, Feldman CH; et al. A school health education program for children with asthma aged 8-11 years. Health Educ Q. 1987;14(3):267-279. ISI | PUBMED
64. Halterman JS, McConnochie KM, Conn KM; et al. A randomized trial of primary care provider prompting to enhance preventive asthma therapy. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(5):422-427. FREE FULL TEXT
65. Evans R III, Gergen PJ, Mitchell H; et al. A randomized clinical trial to reduce asthma morbidity among inner-city children: results of the National Cooperative Inner-City Asthma Study. J Pediatr. 1999;135(3):332-338. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
66. Velsor-Friedrich B, Pigott TD, Louloudes A. The effects of a school-based intervention on the self-care and health of African-American inner-city children with asthma. J Pediatr Nurs. 2004;19(4):247-256. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
67. Whitman N, West D, Brough FK, Welch M. A study of a self-care rehabilitation program in pediatric asthma. Health Educ Q. 1985;12(4):333-342. ISI | PUBMED
68. Wilson SR, Latini D, Starr N; et al. Education of parents of infants and very young children with asthma: a developmental evaluation of the Wee Wheezers program [published correction appears in J Asthma. 1997;34(3):261]. J Asthma. 1996;33(4):239-254. ISI | PUBMED
69. Morgan WJ, Crain EF, Gruchalla RS; et al, Inner-City Asthma Study Group. Results of a home-based environmental intervention among urban children with asthma. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(11):1068-1080. FREE FULL TEXT
70. Maslennikova GYa, Morosova ME, Salman NV, Kulikov SM, Oganov RG. Asthma education programme in Russia: educating patients. Patient Educ Couns. 1998;33(2):113-127. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
71. Toelle BG, Peat JK, Salome CM, Mellis CM, Bauman AE, Woolcock AJ. Evaluation of a community-based asthma management program in a population sample of schoolchildren. Med J Aust. 1993;158(11):742-746. ISI | PUBMED
72. Stergachis A, Gardner JS, Anderson MT, Sullivan SD. Improving pediatric asthma outcomes in the community setting: does pharmaceutical care make a difference? J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2002;42(5):743-752. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
73. Mangione-Smith R, Schonlau M, Chan KS; et al. Measuring the effectiveness of a collaborative for quality improvement in pediatric asthma care: does implementing the chronic care model improve processes and outcomes of care? Ambul Pediatr. 2005;5(2):75-82. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
74. Runge C, Lecheler J, Horn M, Tews JT, Schaefer M. Outcomes of a Web-based patient education program for asthmatic children and adolescents. Chest. 2006;129(3):581-593. FREE FULL TEXT
75. Agrawal SK, Singh M, Mathew JL, Malhi P. Efficacy of an individualized written home-management plan in the control of moderate persistent asthma: a randomized, controlled trial. Acta Paediatr. 2005;94(12):1742-1746. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
76. Christiansen SC, Martin SB, Schleicher NC, Koziol JA, Mathews KP, Zuraw BL. Evaluation of a school-based asthma education program for inner-city children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997;100(5):613-617. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
77. Cicutto L, Murphy S, Coutts D; et al. Breaking the access barrier: evaluating an asthma center's efforts to provide education to children with asthma in schools. Chest. 2005;128(4):1928-1935. FREE FULL TEXT
78. Fireman P, Friday G, Gira C, Vierthaler WA, Michaels L. Teaching self-management skills to asthmatic children and their parents in an ambulatory care setting. Pediatrics. 1981;68(3):341-348. FREE FULL TEXT
79. Hill R, Williams J, Britton J, Tattersfield A. Can morbidity associated with untreated asthma in primary school children be reduced? a controlled intervention study. BMJ. 1991;303(6811):1169-1174. FREE FULL TEXT
80. Hughes DM, McLeod M, Garner B, Goldbloom RB. Controlled trial of a home and ambulatory program for asthmatic children. Pediatrics. 1991;87(1):54-61. FREE FULL TEXT
81. Perrin JM, MacLean WE Jr, Gortmaker SL, Asher KN. Improving the psychological status of children with asthma: a randomized controlled trial. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1992;13(4):241-247. ISI | PUBMED
82. Persaud DI, Barnett SE, Weller SC, Baldwin CD, Niebuhr V, McCormick DP. An asthma self-management program for children, including instruction in peak flow monitoring by school nurses. J Asthma. 1996;33(1):37-43. ISI | PUBMED
83. Deaves DM. An assessment of the value of health education in the prevention of childhood asthma. J Adv Nurs. 1993;18(3):354-363. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
84. Clark NM, Gong M, Schork MA; et al. Long-term effects of asthma education for physicians on patient satisfaction and use of health services. Eur Respir J. 2000;16(1):15-21. ABSTRACT
85. Clark NM, Gong M, Schork MA; et al. Impact of education for physicians on patient outcomes. Pediatrics. 1998;101(5):831-836. FREE FULL TEXT
86. Anderson ME, Freas MR, Wallace AS, Kempe A, Gelfand EW, Liu AH. Successful school-based intervention for inner-city children with persistent asthma. J Asthma. 2004;41(4):445-453. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
87. Kelly CS, Morrow AL, Shults J, Nakas N, Strope GL, Adelman RD. Outcomes evaluation of a comprehensive intervention program for asthmatic children enrolled in Medicaid. Pediatrics. 2000;105(5):1029-1035. FREE FULL TEXT
88. Brook U, Mendelberg A, Heim M. Increasing parental knowledge of asthma decreases the hospitalization of the child: a pilot study. J Asthma. 1993;30(1):45-49. ISI | PUBMED
89. Clark NM, Feldman CH, Evans D, Levison MJ, Wasilewski Y, Mellins RB. The impact of health education on frequency and cost of health care use by low income children with asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1986;78(1, pt 1):108-115. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
90. Clark NM, Feldman C, Evans D; et al. Managing better: children, parents, and asthma. Patient Educ Couns. 1986;8(1):27-38. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
91. Bartholomew LK, Gold RS, Parcel GS; et al. Watch, Discover, Think, and Act: evaluation of computer-assisted instruction to improve asthma self-management in inner-city children. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;39(2-3):269-280. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
92. Mesters I, Meertens R, Kok G, Parcel GS. Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary education protocol in children with asthma (0-4 years) in primary health care. J Asthma. 1994;31(5):347-359. ISI | PUBMED
93. Mesters I, van Nunen M, Crebolder H, Meertens R. Education of parents about paediatric asthma: effects of a protocol on medical consumption. Patient Educ Couns. 1995;25(2):131-136. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
94. Finkelstein JA, Lozano P, Streiff KA; et al, Patient Outcomes Research Team. Clinical effectiveness research in managed-care systems: lessons from the Pediatric Asthma Care PORT. Health Serv Res. 2002;37(3):775-789. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
95. Finkelstein JA, Lozano P, Fuhlbrigge AL; et al, Pediatric Asthma Care Patient Outcomes Research Team. Practice-level effects of interventions to improve asthma care in primary care settings: the Pediatric Asthma Care Patient Outcomes Research Team. Health Serv Res. 2005;40(6, pt 1):1737-1757. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
96. Sullivan SD, Lee TA, Blough DK; et al. A multisite randomized trial of the effects of physician education and organizational change in chronic asthma care: cost-effectiveness analysis of the Pediatric Asthma Care Patient Outcomes Research Team II (PAC-PORT II). Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(5):428-434. FREE FULL TEXT
97. Glasgow NJ, Ponsonby AL, Yates R, Beilby J, Dugdale P. Proactive asthma care in childhood: general practice based randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2003;327(7416):659. FREE FULL TEXT
98. Homer CJ, Forbes P, Horvitz L, Peterson LE, Wypij D, Heinrich P. Impact of a quality improvement program on care and outcomes for children with asthma. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(5):464-469. FREE FULL TEXT
99. González-Martin G, Joo I, Sanchez I. Evaluation of the impact of a pharmaceutical care program in children with asthma. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;49(1):13-18. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
100. Weingarten MA, Goldberg J, Teperberg Y, Harrison N, Oded A. A pilot study of the multidisciplinary management of childhood asthma in a family practice. J Asthma. 1985;22(5):261-265. ISI | PUBMED
101. La Roche MJ, Koinis-Mitchell D, Gualdron L. A culturally competent asthma management intervention: a randomized controlled pilot study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2006;96(1):80-85. PUBMED
102. Eggleston PA, Butz A, Rand C; et al. Home environmental intervention in inner-city asthma: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005;95(6):518-524. ISI | PUBMED
103. Butz A, Pham L, Lewis L; et al. Rural children with asthma: impact of a parent and child asthma education program. J Asthma. 2005;42(10):813-821. FULL TEXT | PUBMED
104. Stevens CA, Wesseldine LJ, Couriel JM, Dyer AJ, Osman LM, Silverman M. Parental education and guided self-management of asthma and wheezing in the pre-school child: a randomised controlled trial. Thorax. 2002;57(1):39-44. FREE FULL TEXT
105. Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH. Intervention Mapping. Designing Theory- and Evidence-based Health Promotion Programs. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2001.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

This Month in Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(6):503.
FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.