 |
 |

Radiological Case of the Month
Kimberly Parente, MD;
Maria-Gisela Mercado-Deane, MD;
Traci Brummund, MD
From the Sections of Pediatric Radiology (Dr Mercado-Deane) and General
Pediatrics (Dr Brummund), Medical College of Georgia (Dr Parente), Augusta.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155:731-732.
A HEALTHY 2-week-old boy was seen for his initial well-child examination
and was noted to have a 3 x 2-cm firm raised lesion over his occipital
area. There was no history of trauma since his birth. The birth history consisted
of an infant born at 39 weeks' gestation to a 27-year-old primigravida mother
who was preeclamptic and had positive culture findings for group B streptococcus.
The delivery was notable for shoulder distocia and nuchal cord. After delivery
the infant had a bruised head and petechiae over his entire face. There was
no swelling in the occipital area. The patient did well and was discharged
home on day 2 of life without complications.
Findings from physical examination were unremarkable except for a 2
x 3-cm swelling over the occipital area and crepitus palpable along
the transverse occipital suture line. He had normal findings on neurological
examination. There was concern regarding possible fracture from abuse or trauma
sustained at birth. Skull radiographs were obtained (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
| |
Figure 1.
|
|
| |
Figure 2.
|
|
 |
Denouement and Discussion: Inca Bone
Figure 1. Anterior-posterior
skull radiograph.
Figure 2. Lateral skull radiograph.
Inca bones are a result of faulty ossification in the interparietal
area of the occipital squama.1 The occipital
squama consists of a supraoccipital area that develops in cartilaginous bone
and an interparietal area that is ossified in membranous bone. Inca bones
form when an additional pair of ossification centers develop in the interparietal
area and do not fuse with the remainder of the occipital bone. They are located
at the lower border of the interparietal occipital suture and slightly above
the external occipital protuberance. The Inca bones fuse completely by age
40 years.1
The distinction between the Inca bone and a skull fracture is accomplished
by noticing the irregular contour of the edges of the Inca bone compared with
the smoother, linear course of a skull fracture.2
The distinction is important in avoiding the patient and the family experiencing
an evaluation for nonaccidental trauma.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Accepted for publication September 22, 1999.
Reprints: Kimberly Parente, MD, Medical College of Georgia, 1120
15th St, Augusta, GA, 30912-3770.
REFERENCES
 |
1. Matsumura G, Uchiumi T, Kida K, Ichikawa R, Kodama G. Developmental studies on the interparietal part of the human occipital
squama. J Anat. 1993;182(Pt 2):197-204.
2. Keats TE. Atlas of Normal Roentgen Variants. 4th ed. Chicago, Ill: Year Book Medical Publishers; 1973:65-67.
SECTION EDITOR: BEVERLY P. WOOD, MD
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|