 |
 |

Approaches to Chlamydia ScreeningOne Size Does Not Fit All
Diane R. Blake, MD
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(6):585-586.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In this issue of the Archives, Tebb et al1 describe a strategy for increasing Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) screening rates among adolescent girls who make urgent care visits to a large health maintenance organization (HMO). Why is such a study important? C trachomatis, the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection in the United States, disproportionately affects sexually active women between the ages of 15 and 24 years.2 The vast majority of CT infections are asymptomatic3; therefore, most infections will be detected only through systematic screening efforts. Left untreated, CT may progress to pelvic inflammatory disease with possible sequelae of infertility and ectopic pregnancy.3
Many organizations, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention3 and the US Preventive Services Task Force,4 have written guidelines recommending annual CT screening in sexually active females aged 25 years and younger. However, many eligible adolescent girls and young adult . . . [Full Text of this Article] AUTHOR INFORMATION
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLES
Screening for Asymptomatic Chlamydia Infections Among Sexually Active Adolescent Girls During Pediatric Urgent Care
Kathleen P. Tebb, Charles Wibbelsman, John M. Neuhaus, and Mary-Ann Shafer
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(6):559-564.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Chlamydia Screening: A Routine Test
Megan A. Moreno, Fred Furtner, and Frederick P. Rivara
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(6):592.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|