You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 162 No. 11, November 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  The Pediatric Forum
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related articles
 •Related letters
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Strong Design and Comprehensive Analysis of the Child-Parent Center Study

Arthur J. Reynolds, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(11):1099-1100.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Our study of the Child-Parent Center (CPC) early intervention program1 found that participation was associated with greater health and well-being by age 24 years. In one of the editorials that accompanied our article,2 Olds criticized the study as having limited validity because it was not a randomized controlled trial (RCT). Olds advocated that only RCTs can yield valid and confident estimates of effects. Indeed, only 1 of the 14 paragraphs in the editorial discussed the actual study at all, with the rest focused on particular research questions that the early intervention field should address with RCTs.

As described in the article and in many supporting studies, the findings of the CPC study have high validity for many reasons: (1) the program was implemented in the most economically disadvantaged areas and program staff sought those who were most at risk; (2) the control group was mostly selected . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLES

Effects of a School-Based, Early Childhood Intervention on Adult Health and Well-being: A 19-Year Follow-up of Low-Income Families
Arthur J. Reynolds, Judy A. Temple, Suh-Ruu Ou, Dylan L. Robertson, Joshua P. Mersky, James W. Topitzes, and Michael D. Niles
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(8):730-739.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Improving Preschool for Low-Income Children With Programmatic Randomized Controlled Trials
David Olds
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(8):807-809.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED LETTERS

Strong Design and Comprehensive Analysis of the Child-Parent Center Study—Reply
David L. Olds
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(11):1100.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Strong Design and Comprehensive Analysis of the Child-Parent Center Study—Reply
Arthur J. Reynolds
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(11):1101.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2008 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.