 |
 |

Growth Attenuation: Unjustifiable Non-therapy—Reply
Daniel F. Gunther, MD, MA;
Douglas S. Diekema, MD, MPH
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(5):521-522.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In reply
Dr Bersani strongly objects to the proactive measures we have taken to attenuate the growth of our profoundly developmentally disabled patient, which we believe has improved the quality of her life and that of her family. Although Dr Bersani endorses "policies and actions that help families to rear their children at home," he views growth attenuation as "a totally unacceptable option." In so far as we understand them, his objections seem to be the following:
All children are capable of some learning. In general, we agree with Dr Bersani on this point but fail to see the relevance. Even if this child were capable of some marginal improvement in her cognitive abilities, it would not change her circumstances. It is important to dispel any misperception here—the little girl we discuss in our article is never going to . . . [Full Text of this Article] AUTHOR INFORMATION
RELATED LETTER
Growth Attenuation: Unjustifiable Non-therapy
Hank Bersani
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(5):520-521.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLES
Attenuating Growth in Children With Profound Developmental Disability: A New Approach to an Old Dilemma
Daniel F. Gunther and Douglas S. Diekema
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160(10):1013-1017.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Growth Attenuation: A Diminutive Solution to a Daunting Problem
Jeffrey P. Brosco and Chris Feudtner
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160(10):1077-1078.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|