You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 160 No. 4, April 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  The Pediatric Forum
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Immunization
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Needle Aspiration and Intramuscular Vaccination

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160:451.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Needle aspiration is the process of pulling back on the syringe plunger prior to injection. Its purported importance is to prevent accidental entry of the needle into a blood vessel, but there is no scientific evidence to support its need. The most recent guidelines published by the American Academy of Pediatrics (Elk Grove Village, Ill) recommend that aspiration prior to intramuscular vaccination may not be necessary,1 while the Canadian guidelines continue to recommend aspiration.2 It is not surprising therefore that both techniques are currently being used by vaccinators. The objective of this survey was to determine which technique vaccinators are currently using.

A 22-item categorical questionnaire was sent to all community pediatric offices registered with the Continuing Medical Education Department, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario (n = 248). The Hospital for Sick Children Research Ethics Board granted ethical approval for the study. The primary outcome was whether community pediatricians and nurses . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Moshe Ipp, MD; Jonathan Sam, BSc; Patricia C. Parkin, MD



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Vaccine-related pain: randomised controlled trial of two injection techniques
Ipp et al.
Arch. Dis. Child. 2007;92:1105-1108.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Vaccine Injection Techniques: Quicker is Better
Dubik
AAP Grand Rounds 2007;18:49-50.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2006 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.