 |
 |

Advocacy Is Not a Specialty
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:892.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
A bush of wild roses, lovely but tangled and full of thorns is how I view the pediatric residency review committees new requirement of "structured educational experiences that prepare residents for the role of advocate for the health of children within the community."1
The idea, of course, is wonderful. Who can argue with residents becoming familiar with how children function outside of clinical settings? And implementing aspects of this vision may even be feasible. For example, elsewhere in this issue of the ARCHIVES, Chamberlain and colleagues2 report favorably on the experiences of advocacy training at Stanford University in Palo Alto, Calif, the University of Miami in Miami, Fla, and the University of California, San Francisco. Protected time was carved out of existing block rotations for two 3-hour preparatory workshops, independent field work, and presentation of the projects to peers and faculty. Using tools introduced during the workshops, "each . . . [Full Text of this Article] AUTHOR INFORMATION
Abraham B. Bergman, MD
RELATED LETTER
Advocacy by Any Other Name Would Smell as Sweet
Lisa J. Chamberlain, Lee M. Sanders, and John I. Takayama
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2006;160(4):453.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLE
Child Advocacy Training: Curriculum Outcomes and Resident Satisfaction
Lisa J. Chamberlain, Lee M. Sanders, and John I. Takayama
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159(9):842-847.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Medical Management of Vulnerable and Underserved Patients
Sandel
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2008;162:493-493.
FULL TEXT
Advocacy by Any Other Name Would Smell as Sweet
Chamberlain et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006;160:453-453.
FULL TEXT
|