You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 159 No. 4, April 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Closing the Quality Chasm in Health Care

The Role of Critical Reading

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:394-395.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Few would argue that the well-discussed chasm between the quality of health care, as it is currently offered, and the level of quality expected by patients, insurers, and our profession itself is not real. The Institute of Medicine (Washington, DC) has clearly articulated the components of high-quality care.1 In addition to being patient centered, timely, and equitable, care must be efficient, effective, and safe. These latter 3 components depend on physicians applying the fruits of the biomedical research enterprise to the individual doctor-patient encounter.

The biomedical research enterprise of the United States is a true success story. Funded by both the federal government and private industry, our biomedical research program has been the world leader in the discovery of disease mechanisms and the development of new methods to treat and prevent illness. As members of the medical community, we are ultimately responsible to the public for the return on their . . . [Full Text of this Article]

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Frederick P. Rivara, MD, MPH; F. Bruder Stapleton, MD



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Can We Improve the Return Rate for Tuberculin Skin Test Readings?
Jacono et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006;160:106-106.
FULL TEXT  

Adult Learning
Benjamin
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006;160:106-107.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2005 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.