You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 158 No. 7, July 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Health Policy
 •Law and Medicine
 •End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Dying Young

Cues From the Courts

Rhonda Gay Hartman, JD, PhD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:615-619.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

In an age where longevity is coveted and celebrated, dying young seems antithetical to the extraordinary biomedical achievements that extend and enhance life. Yet, many adolescents die in hospitals from disease and accident. Despite extensive law and literature addressing end-of-life issues for adults, little information exists about particular concerns and challenges confronting dying adolescents. This information is important not only for improving quality of care but, to some extent, for providing a mirror that reflects the way we ought to treat any dying patient.

The Fourteenth Amendment liberty concept safeguards medical decision making by competent adults, including refusal of life-prolonging care.1 Although the scope of constitutionally protected decision-making autonomy by adolescents is not clear, the US Supreme Court stated that inexperience limits minors' legal autonomy for "making life's difficult decisions."2(p605) Invoking conventional notions of adolescent vulnerability and immaturity that might impair capable decision making, the . . . [Full Text of this Article]

DETERMINANTS OF MINORS' DECISION-MAKING ABILITY


ADOLESCENT PATIENT PREFERENCES

THIRD-PARTY INTERVENTION

PALLIATION AND COMFORT CARE

CONCLUSION
From the School of Medicine and Center for Bioethics and Health Law, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Home pediatric compassionate extubation: bridging intensive and palliative care.
Zwerdling et al.
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2006;23:224-228.
ABSTRACT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.