You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 158 No. 5, May 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Evidence-Based Journal Club
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Asthma
 •Evidence-Based Journal Club
 •Immunology
 •Allergy
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Interpreting Subgroup Analyses

Is a School-Based Asthma Treatment Program's Effect Modified by Secondhand Smoke Exposure?

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:469-471.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Halterman et al1 present a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a school-based asthma treatment program in this issue of the ARCHIVES. The authors enrolled 184 children with asthma 3 to 7 years of age from 1 school district. Children were identified via a school health form and were eligible for enrollment if at least mild persistent asthma was confirmed and the primary care physician (PCP) agreed with the need for daily inhaled steroids. After obtaining consent from the family and PCP and completing a baseline assessment, eligible children were randomized to the school-based intervention or control group. In both groups, parents and PCPs were notified of the child's asthma severity. On weekdays, school nurses administered study-provided inhaled steroids to the intervention group children; a second steroid inhaler was given to families for home use on nonschool days. Inhaled steroids were recommended but neither provided nor directly administered . . . [Full Text of this Article]

VALIDITY

Randomization

Accounting for Subjects

Blinding

Equal Treatment of Groups, Aside From the Intervention


TREATMENT EFFECT

GENERALIZABILITY

SUBGROUP ANALYSIS
Source of Comparisons

Hypothesized Subgroup Effects

Effect Size

Indirect Evidence


CONCLUSIONS
David G. Bundy, MD, MPH; Molly Curtin Berkoff, MD, MPH; Kristin E. Ito, MD; Marjorie S. Rosenthal, MD; Morris Weinberger, PhD
Chapel Hill, NC



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

Benefits of a School-Based Asthma Treatment Program in the Absence of Secondhand Smoke Exposure: Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial
Jill S. Halterman, Peter G. Szilagyi, H. Lorrie Yoos, Kelly M. Conn, Jeffrey M. Kaczorowski, Robert J. Holzhauer, Sherri C. Lauver, Tia L. Neely, Patrick M. Callahan, and Kenneth M. McConnochie
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158(5):460-467.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2004 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.