This Article  • Full text  • PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Topic Collections  • Journalology/ Peer Review/ Authorship  • Alert me on articles by topic

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158:201-203.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

The quality of any peer-reviewed publication rests on 2 things: the papers arriving in the mail each day and the work of the peer reviewers in helping the editors decide which of the many manuscripts received should be published. Peer reviewers are chosen because of their expertise and reputation, and, thus, almost by definition, they are busy people. Yet, peer reviewers are willing to spend their own time in helping others—us the editors, you the readers, and, of course, the authors. They help us decide if an article is scientifically valid and if it contributes to new knowledge. The journal simply couldn't be published without their involvement. We sincerely and gratefully thank you for your help.—The Editors

A-B

Matthew C. Aalsma, Deborah J. Aaron, Herbert T. Abelson, A. Reese Abright, Sally Adams, Raymond D. Adelman, William Adelman, Benoosh Afghani, Phyllis F. Agran, Mary E. Aitken, Anthony J. Alario, Jr, Elizabeth . . . [Full Text of this Article]

C-D

E-F

G-H

I-J

K-L

M-N

O-P

R-S

T-V

W-Z