You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 156 No. 10, October 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Evidence-Based Journal Club
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Viral Infections
 •Randomized Controlled Trial
 •Evidence-Based Journal Club
 •Infectious Diseases
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Is Duct Tape Occlusion Therapy as Effective as Cryotherapy for the Treatment of the Common Wart?

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156:975-977.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

THIS RANDOMIZED controlled trial was conducted to assess whether duct tape occlusion therapy is as effective as cryotherapy for the treatment of common warts.1 Patients 3 to 22 years of age who visited the pediatric clinics on a military base in Washington State with at least 1 common wart on an extremity were approached for study enrollment. Sixty-one subjects were enrolled and randomized to either cryotherapy or duct tape occlusion therapy.

The cryotherapy group had liquid nitrogen applied to the study wart every 2 to 3 weeks for a maximum of 6 treatments or until wart resolution. The duct tape occlusion group had a small piece of duct tape applied to the study wart, which was left in place for 6 days. This tape was removed on the evening of the sixth day and then replaced the following morning for a maximum of 2 months or until wart resolution. Subjects . . . [Full Text of this Article]

RANDOMIZATION OF SUBJECTS


BLINDED ASSESSMENT

FOLLOW-UP

TREATMENT EFFECT SIZE AND PRECISION

GENERALIZABILITY

CLINICALLY IMPORTANT OUTCOMES

TREATMENT BENEFITS AND COSTS

CONCLUSIONS


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED ARTICLE

The Efficacy of Duct Tape vs Cryotherapy in the Treatment of Verruca Vulgaris (the Common Wart)
Dean R. Focht III, Carole Spicer, and Mary P. Fairchok
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156(10):971-974.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Efficacy of Duct Tape vs Placebo in the Treatment of Verruca Vulgaris (Warts) in Primary School Children.
de Haen et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006;160:1121-1125.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Duct tape occlusion treatment increased resolution in common paediatric warts
Williams
Evid. Based Med. 2003;8:58-58.
FULL TEXT  

Review: common topical applications containing salicylic acid or lactic acid improve clinical cure in non-refractory viral warts
Williams
Evid. Based Med. 2003;8:59-59.
FULL TEXT  

Duct Tape May Be Comparable to Cryotherapy for Simple Warts
Krowchuk
AAP Grand Rounds 2003;9:6-7.
FULL TEXT  

Another Use for Duct Tape: Wart Removal
JWatch General 2002;2002:5-5.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2002 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.