 |
|
Reviewing Manuscripts for Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
Peter Cummings, MD, MPH;
Frederick P. Rivara, MD, MPH
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002;156:11-13.
|
|
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
|
|
Peer review is a critical element in the editorial process at Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. The goals
are to provide expert advice to the authors regarding their work, a check
on the scientific validity of the data and methods, and information to the
editors for use in their decision about the suitability of the paper for publication
in the ARCHIVES.
The quality of journals rests, to a large degree, on the quality of
the peer review process. Like nearly all scientific journals, the ARCHIVES
relies on a volunteer pool of talented individuals who take time out of their
busy week to review manuscripts. The journal could not be published without
their help, and we are extremely grateful for their efforts. However, reviewers
are rarely given any advice, by their senior colleagues or anyone else, on
the best way . . . [Full Text of this Article] GENERAL APPROACH
PARTS OF A REVIEW
General Comments Title and Abstract Introduction Methods Results Comment References Comments to the Editors
TIMELINESS OF REVIEWS
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST FOR REVIEWERS
BENEFITS OF REVIEWING
From the Departments of Epidemiology (Drs Cummings and Rivara) and
Pediatrics (Dr Rivara), University of Washington, Seattle.
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Publication Bias: The Problem and Some Suggestions
Rivara and Cummings
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:424-425.
FULL TEXT
|
