You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 155 No. 5, May 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Tobacco
 •Health Policy
 •Law and Medicine
 •Adolescent Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Curtailing Youth Smoking

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155:546-547.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

MOST PEOPLE agree that tobacco products should not be available to youths younger than 18 years of age. There is considerable disagreement, however, on how this objective should be achieved. In 1992, Congress passed an amendment named after the late Mike Synar, a Democratic representative from Oklahoma, requiring states to adopt and enforce laws establishing a minimum age limit for buyers of tobacco products and to show progressive reductions in the availability of tobacco products to minors. Failure to meet these requirements would result in forfeiture of federal block grant funds for substance abuse prevention and treatment. Funds were not provided to the states, however, to assist in tobacco law enforcement activities. Evaluation of the effects of the legislation were to be provided in the usual government fashion: yearly progress reports to the federal Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS).

Joseph DiFranza, a professor of family and community medicine . . . [Full Text of this Article]

PRODIGIOUS EFFORT BY ONE INDIVIDUAL


QUESTIONABLE VERACITY OF REPORTS

MISPLACED BLAME

PASSAGE VS IMPLEMENTATION OF LEGISLATION

THE TENACITY, INGENUITY, AND RESOURCES OF THE TOBACCO INDUSTRY

RELATED ARTICLE

State and Federal Compliance With the Synar Amendment: Federal Fiscal Year 1998
Joseph R. DiFranza
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155(5):572-578.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.