 |
 |

Child Advocacy and Robust Community-Centered Research
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155:438-439.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
DOES THE DRUG piracetam improve the cognition of children with Down
syndrome?1 In contrast with exuberant testimonials
appearing on television and the Internet, Lobaugh et al2
found no substantial benefit in their randomized controlled study. Despite
the trial's relatively small cohort size, its rigorous double-blinded crossover
design should earn our respect, while their findings (especially of undesirable
behavioral effects) should temper our enthusiasm for piracetam markedly.
Will it? An analogy drawn from recent history suggests otherwise. After
a well-conducted study3 of secretin's effect
on children with autism and pervasive development disorder, which similarly
showed no substantial benefit, parents of children enrolled in the trial still
wished to continue treatment, and a variety of advocacy groups challenged
the legitimacy of the study's conclusions and called for more research.3, 4 Such occurrences should give us pause
to consider how to avoid these cycles of frustration.
ADVOCACY COMMUNITIES IN THE INFORMATION AGE
Given the diversity of child advocatesfrom parents to . . . [Full Text of this Article] SCIENCE, SOCIETY, AND ATTRIBUTES OF ROBUST RESEARCH
PARADIGM OF PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH
RELATED ARTICLE
Piracetam Therapy Does Not Enhance Cognitive Functioning in Children With Down Syndrome
Nancy J. Lobaugh, Vladimir Karaskov, Vicki Rombough, Joanne Rovet, Susan Bryson, Rachel Greenbaum, Robert H. Haslam, and Gideon Koren
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155(4):442-448.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Piracetam Does Not Help Cognition in Down's Syndrome
JWatch General 2001;2001:6-6.
FULL TEXT
|