You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 155 No. 12, December 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  The Pediatric Forum
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Toleration for the Boy Scouts

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155:1391.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

As a pediatrician, I have been aware of and have carefully considered the Supreme Court's ruling on the BSA's policy on homosexuality. I have reached a very different conclusion, however, from Girard et al.

The authors state that "There is no medical evidence to suggest an association between homosexuality and impaired moral judgment." This is an absurd juxtaposition! To design such a study first requires one to define "impaired moral judgment," which is (1) not a medical issue; and (2) the issue already begged. Unfortunately for the case being made by Girard et al, there are several reports in the medical and nonmedical literature of gay adults who have tested positive for the human immunodeficiency virus who purposefully failed to use condoms during anal and oral intercourse. Does this not qualify as impaired moral judgment? Perhaps it depends on who is doing the defining.

The authors also state that "the . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.