 |
 |

The Questions We Need to Ask Now
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155:1093-1094.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
IN THIS issue of the ARCHIVES, Siegel and colleagues1
ask whether intervention effects of a school-based human immunodeficiency
virus/sexually transmitted disease (HIV/STD) prevention intervention are enduring
1 year later. The results they report suggest that knowledge remains higher
as does intention to practice safe sex and behavior among some subgroups.
These data are important because when merged with a growing volume of
research results, we are beginning to reap the answers to the questions we
have been asking over the last decade. Can we purposefully affect sexual behavior
among adolescents? (Yes.)2, 3 Are
adolescents well served by discussing sexual decision making before as well
as after the onset of coitus? (Yes.)1 Are behavioral
changes enduring? (Somewhat, but not as enduring as we might like.)2, 4
These are important questions, as are the many questions that are being
asked about variations in intervention delivery, differing impacts of varied
messages of abstinence and safer . . . [Full Text of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED ARTICLE
Long-term Effects of a Middle School and High SchoolBased Human Immunodeficiency Virus Sexual Risk Prevention Intervention
David M. Siegel, Marilyn J. Aten, and Maisha Enaharo
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155(10):1117-1126.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
|