You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 152 No. 7, July 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Special Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on ISI (31)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Guides for Reading and Interpreting Systematic Reviews

I. Getting Started

Terry P. Klassen, MD, MSc; Alejandro R. Jadad, MD, DPhil; David Moher, MSc

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152:700-704.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

INTRODUCTION

It is almost impossible for any individual to keep up-to-date with the health care literature. There are approximately 17000 new biomedical books published every year, along with 30000 biomedical journals, resulting in annual increase of 7%.1-2 Physicians attempting to keep abreast of their field would need to read, on average, 19 original articles each day.3 Reviews offer the potential to reach that elusive goal: making life easier.

In the past few years, the ARCHIVES has published systematic reviews on the role of metered-dose inhaler accessory devices compared with nebulizers for the treatment of acute asthma management,4 the efficacy of bronchodilator therapy for bronchiolitis,5 and the behavioral and cognitive effects of methylxanthines.6 These are all complex clinical issues, and for any one clinician to gather and synthesize the evidence would be very time-consuming.


NARRATIVE REVIEWS

Traditionally, individuals often considered experts . . . [Full Text of this Article]

SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AND META-ANALYSES

ADVANTAGES

LIMITATIONS

POTENTIAL HARMS

DEVELOPING THE QUESTION

DEVELOPING SELECTION CRITERIA

VALIDITY AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS

REPLICABILITY AND SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS

SETTING THE STAGE: AN EXAMPLE

CONCLUSIONS

From the Departments of Pediatrics (Dr Klassen and Mr Moher), and Epidemiology and Community Health (Dr Klassen and Mr Moher), University of Ottawa, Thomas C. Chalmers Center for Systematic Reviews, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario's Research Institute (Dr Klassen and Mr Moher) Ottawa; and Health Information Research Unit, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton (Dr Jadad) Ontario.


RELATED ARTICLE

Information Overload? Read 3 of These and You Won't Have to Call in the Morning
Susan Radius and Alain Joffe
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152(7):622-623.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

An evaluation of search and selection methods used in dental systematic reviews published in English.
Major et al.
Journal of the American Dental Association 2006;137:1252-1257.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

What Interventions Should Pharmacists Employ to Impact Health Practitioners' Prescribing Practices?
Grindrod et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2006;40:1546-1557.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Group interventions for the prevention of injuries in young children: a systematic review
Bruce and McGrath
Inj. Prev. 2005;11:143-147.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Understanding the basic principles of knowledge translation
Choi
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2005;59:93-93.
FULL TEXT  

An Example of the Use of Systematic Reviews to Answer an Effectiveness Question
Forbes
West J Nurs Res 2003;25:179-192.
ABSTRACT  

Components of Effective Youth Violence Prevention Programs for 7- to 14-Year-Olds
Cooper et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2000;154:1134-1139.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Evidence-based Medicine: A New Science or an Epidemiologic Fad?
Bauchner
Pediatrics 1999;103:1029-1031.
FULL TEXT  

Information Overload? Read 3 of These and You Won't Have to Call in the Morning
Radius and Joffe
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998;152:622-623.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.