You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 152 No. 2, February 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  The Pediatric Forum
 This Article
 •Full text
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Curriculum Changes Need Not Be Bad

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998;152:210-211.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text and any section headings.

Potts and Phelan1 present an interesting review of the outcomes of a change in the curriculum at their pediatric clerkship site. I question whether their data support their conclusion. They do not give enough information to conclude that the 2 student groups are equal. It is commonplace in many schools for students to select their clerkship site and these choices are made according to many variables, including rumored test performance. It is also unclear what emphasis the test was given at the Peoria, Ill, site. Students will do well on what they believe is important to their grade, which is supported by the improvement in the scores on the essay test administered at the Rockford, Ill, site. It would have been interesting to see a comparison of the 2 sites prior to the change and of the Rockford site before and after the change.

Changes in scores need not be . . . [Full Text of this Article]







HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.