You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 164 No. 3, March 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Article
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •eTable
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (3)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatrics
 •Adolescent Medicine
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Hematology/ Hematologic Malignancies
 •Leukemias/ Lymphomas
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Differences in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Survival Between Young Adults and Children

Eric Tai, MD; Lori A. Pollack, MD; Julie Townsend, MS; Jun Li, MD; C. Brooke Steele, DO; Lisa C. Richardson, MD

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164(3):218-224.

Objective  To examine differences in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) survival between young adults and children/adolescents.

Design  Survival analysis using 13 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries.

Setting  Cancer survival information from population-based cancer registries from 1992 through 2001.

Participants  A total of 2442 cases of NHL among children/adolescents (aged 0-19 years) and young adults (aged 20-29 years).

Main Exposure  Differences in NHL survival between young adults and children.

Main Outcome Measures  Comparison of 5-year survival by constructing Kaplan-Meier survival curves and modeling 5-year survival with multivariate Cox proportional hazards.

Results  Young adults were more likely to die compared with children/adolescents (hazard ratio = 2.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.65-2.56) even after accounting for NHL subtype and stage at diagnosis. Persons diagnosed with stage III disease (hazard ratio = 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-2.46) and stage IV disease (hazard ratio = 3.19; 95% confidence interval, 2.47-4.13) were more likely to die compared with persons diagnosed with stage I disease.

Conclusions  Being a young adult at diagnosis and having a higher stage of disease at diagnosis were associated with higher risk of death from NHL. Increasing survival with NHL is dependent on receiving appropriate cancer therapy. Therefore, efforts to address survival should include improving enrollment in clinical trials as well as increasing access to care.


Author Affiliations: Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Malignant hematologic diseases in adolescents and young adults
Wood and Lee
Blood 2011;117:5803-5815.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Quality Cancer Care for Adolescents and Young Adults: A Position Statement
Zebrack et al.
JCO 2010;28:4862-4867.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Survival Among Adolescents
Tai et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010;164:779-780.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2010 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.