 |
 |

Male Circumcision for the Prevention of Acquisition and Transmission of Sexually Transmitted InfectionsThe Case for Neonatal Circumcision
Aaron A. R. Tobian, MD, PhD;
Ronald H. Gray, MD, MSc;
Thomas C. Quinn, MD, MSc
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164(1):78-84.
The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) male circumcision policy states that while there are potential medical benefits of newborn male circumcision, the data are insufficient to recommend routine neonatal circumcision. Since 2005, however, 3 randomized trials have evaluated male circumcision for prevention of sexually transmitted infections. The trials found that circumcision decreases human immunodeficiency virus acquisition by 53% to 60%, herpes simplex virus type 2 acquisition by 28% to 34%, and human papillomavirus prevalence by 32% to 35% in men. Among female partners of circumcised men, bacterial vaginosis was reduced by 40%, and Trichomonas vaginalis infection was reduced by 48%. Genital ulcer disease was also reduced among males and their female partners. These findings are also supported by observational studies conducted in the United States. The AAP policy has a major impact on neonatal circumcision in the United States. This review evaluates the recent data that support revision of the AAP policy to fully reflect the evidence of long-term health benefits of male circumcision.
Author Affiliations: Departments of Pathology (Dr Tobian) and Medicine (Dr Quinn), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore (Dr Gray); and Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (Dr Quinn).
CiteULike Connotea Delicious Digg Facebook Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
RELATED LETTER
When Is a Review Article Not a Review Article?—Reply
Aaron A. R. Tobian, Ronald H. Gray, and Thomas C. Quinn
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164(9):884.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
RELATED ARTICLES
Male Circumcision: New Information About Health Benefits
Megan A. Moreno, Fred Furtner, and Frederick P. Rivara
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164(1):104.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
This Month in Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164(1):8.
FULL TEXT
Newborn Circumcision: Routine or Not Routine, That Is the Question
Michael T. Brady
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2010;164(1):94-96.
EXTRACT
| FULL TEXT
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
 |
Benefits of Male Circumcision--Reply
Tobian and Gray
JAMA 2012;307:457-457.
FULL TEXT
Male Circumcision and Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 Infection in Female Partners: A Randomized Trial in Rakai, Uganda
Tobian et al.
The Journal of Infectious Disease 2012;205:486-490.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Trends in In-Hospital Newborn Male Circumcision--United States, 1999-2010
JAMA 2011;306:1651-1651.
FULL TEXT
The Medical Benefits of Male Circumcision
Tobian and Gray
JAMA 2011;306:1479-1480.
FULL TEXT
When Is a Review Article Not a Review Article?
Van Howe
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010;164:883-884.
FULL TEXT
When Is a Review Article Not a Review Article?--Reply
Tobian et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010;164:884-884.
FULL TEXT
Circumcision: Divided we fall
Arie
BMJ 2010;341:c4266-c4266.
FULL TEXT
Neonatal Male Circumcision: Time for a Clear Recommendation?
JWatch Pediatrics 2010;2010:2-2.
FULL TEXT
Newborn Circumcision: Routine or Not Routine, That Is the Question
Brady
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010;164:94-96.
FULL TEXT
|