You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


Advertisement

ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 163 No. 5, May 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Review Article
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (21)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Pediatrics
 •Pediatrics, Other
 •Statistics and Research Methods
 •Review
 •Prognosis/ Outcomes
 •Reading, Writing, and Interpreting the Medical Literature
 •Alert me on articles by topic
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Relative Merits of Risk Ratios and Odds Ratios

Peter Cummings, MD, MPH

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(5):438-445.

When a study outcome is rare in all strata used for an analysis, the odds ratio estimate of causal effects will approximate the risk ratio; therefore, odds ratios from most case-control studies can be interpreted as risk ratios. However, if a study outcome is common, the odds ratio will be further from 1 than the risk ratio. There is debate regarding the merits of risk ratios compared with odds ratios for the analysis of trials and cohort and cross-sectional studies with common outcomes. Odds ratios are conveniently symmetrical with regard to the outcome definition; the odds ratio for outcome Y is the inverse of the odds ratio for the outcome not Y. Risk ratios lack this symmetry, so it may be necessary to present 1 risk ratio for outcome Y and another for outcome not Y. Risk ratios, but not odds ratios, have a mathematical property called collapsibility; this means that the size of the risk ratio will not change if adjustment is made for a variable that is not a confounder. Because of collapsibility, the risk ratio, assuming no confounding, has a useful interpretation as the ratio change in average risk due to exposure among the exposed. Because odds ratios are not collapsible, they usually lack any interpretation either as the change in average odds or the average change in odds (the average odds ratio).


Author Affiliations: Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, and Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Quality of Early Maternal-Child Relationship and Risk of Adolescent Obesity
Anderson et al.
Pediatrics 2012;129:132-140.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Developmental Trajectories of Body Mass Index in Early Childhood and Their Risk Factors: An 8-Year Longitudinal Study
Pryor et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011;165:906-912.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Attachment Security and Obesity in US Preschool-Aged Children
Anderson and Whitaker
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011;165:235-242.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Young Adult Outcomes of Children Growing Up With Chronic Illness: An Analysis of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health
Maslow et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011;165:256-261.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Health Outcomes and Family Services in Kinship Care: Analysis of a National Sample of Children in the Child Welfare System
Sakai et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011;165:159-165.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The relationship between residential proximity to extremely low frequency power transmission lines and adverse birth outcomes
Auger et al.
J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2011;65:83-85.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Self-control as a Protective Factor Against Overweight Status in the Transition From Childhood to Adolescence
Tsukayama et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010;164:631-635.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Refill Adherence to Oral Hypoglycemic Agents and Glycemic Control in Veterans
Kim et al.
The Annals of Pharmacotherapy 2010;44:800-808.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The Changing Distribution and Determinants of Obesity in the Neighborhoods of New York City, 2003-2007
Black and Macinko
Am J Epidemiol 2010;171:765-775.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Efficacy of a Theory-Based Abstinence-Only Intervention Over 24 Months: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Young Adolescents
Jemmott et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010;164:152-159.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

P Values vs Estimates of Association With Confidence Intervals
Cummings and Koepsell
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2010;164:193-196.
FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.